Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Mar 15.
Published in final edited form as: Mathematics (Basel). 2022 Mar 4;10(5):823. doi: 10.3390/math10050823

Table 5.

Results of the clinical data uncertainty robustness analysis for the patient case 02-CoA. Estimated model parameter values of the second step of the active mechanics personalisation approach are given. The original values produced by the default initial guesses are listed in the first row and means (M), standard deviations (SD), minima (Min), and maxima (Max) of ten samples are listed in the subsequent rows. Means, standard deviations, minima, and maxima of the relative differences are given in brackets below.

nTRPN
(-)
β1
(-)
nTm
(-)
[Ca2+]50ref
(μM)
kUW
(ms−1)
[Ca2+]res
(μM)
[Ca2+]max
(μM)
τCR
(ms)
τCD
(ms)
Original 3.22 −1.21 5.47 0.501 0.046 0.076 0.900 164.4 149.0
Mean 3.60
(27.0%)
−1.20
(0.3%)
4.94
(11.5%)
0.507
(1.3%)
0.055
(32.7%)
0.075
(1.6%)
0.900
(<0.1%)
158.1
(5.4%)
154.0
(4.8%)
SD 0.94
(16.4%)
<0.01
(0.2%)
0.76
(12.4%)
0.017
(3.3%)
0.022
(40.4%)
<0.001
(0.4%)
<0.001
(<0.1%)
7.0
(2.1%)
6.2
(2.4%)
Min 2.42
(9.1%)
−1.21
(0.0%)
3.01
(1.8%)
0.500
(0.1%)
0.036
(1.1%)
0.075
(0.8%)
0.899
(<0.1%)
147.7
(2.0%)
141.7
(0.3%)
Max 5.00
(55.1%)
−1.20
(0.5%)
5.79
(44.9%)
0.557
(11.2%)
0.109
(138.8%)
0.076
(2.0%)
0.900
(0.1%)
173.5
(10.2%)
162.2
(8.8%)