Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 4.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychopathol. 2018 Aug 1;30(3):1145–1156. doi: 10.1017/S0954579418000330

Table 2. Bivariate correlations underlying the latent path analytic models (n = 785).

Variable 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
1. Internalising Problems (ages 7-15) 1
2. Externalising Problems (ages 7-15) 0.390* 1
3. Cognitive Function (age 7) -0.151* -0.223* 1
4. ePGS (birth) -0.037 0.069 -0.098* 1
5. ePGS (age 7) 0.151* 0.036 0.025 0.201* 1
6. ePGS (age 15-17) 0.008 -0.002 0.017 0.175* 0.314* 1
7. Prenatal Adversity (18-32 wks) 0.145* 0.239* -0.109 0.042 -0.041 -0.067 1
8. Postnatal Adversity (birth - age 7) 0.215* 0.156* -0.077 0.008 0.103* 0.005 0.179* 1
9. Sex (1=female, 0=male) 0.104* -0.152* -0.028 -0.211* -0.151* -0.34* -0.024 -0.004 1
10. Cell Type (birth) -0.024 0.043 -0.06 0.635* 0.144* 0.136* 0.015 0.003 -0.144* 1
11. Cell Type (age 7) 0.042 -0.001 0.016 0.054 0.348* 0.138* -0.048 -0.009 -0.049 0.080* 1

Note. Absolute value of i-ePGS score is depicted in this graph, to mirror direction of CRP (higher) based on previous DNAm immune studies (Janusek et al., 2017; Ligthart et al., 2016); non-shaded area = study variables; shaded area = control variables; i-ePGS = epigenetic risk scores; * p < 0.05.