Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 May 3.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Protoc. 2022 Feb 4;17(3):596–617. doi: 10.1038/s41596-021-00664-5

Figure 2. Collected responses from contributors regarding the importance of the main items (rating phase).

Figure 2

This figure depicts the rating of the checklist items by 54 respondents in the rating phase. Each item was rated from 1-5 (not important-extremely important). 14 items reached the 80% threshold (rated as either moderately, highly, or extremely important by more than 80% of the respondents). The items that did not reach this threshold are marked with "†"). 16 items reached the 70% threshold (rated as either moderately, highly, or extremely important by more than 70% of the respondents). The one item, which did not reach this threshold is marked with "‡". Full text of the items is provided in Tables 1-3.