. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jul 28.

Published in final edited form as: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2020 Feb 1;20(1):128–140. doi: 10.3758/s13415-019-00757-5

Table 3.

PANAS-PA (Positive Affectivity), PANAS-NA (Negative Affectivity), PANAS-Total score, ERQ-Expressive Suppression, IRI-Perspective Taking, IRI-Empathic Concern subscales among low and high reappraisers. Group, numerosity (N), mean, standard deviation (SD) for each variable are shown, in addition to Student’ t, p value and Cohen’s d for each comparison between groups

	Group	N	Mean	SD	Mean difference
PANAS-PA (Positive Affectivity)	Low reap.	18	32.72	5.188	t(35) = -1.625, p = 0.113, d = -0.534
PANAS-PA (Positive Affectivity)	High reap.	19	35.26	4.306	t(35) = -1.625, p = 0.113, d = -0.534
PANAS-NA (Negative Affectivity)	Low reap.	18	22.11	6.038	t(35) = 2.133, p = 0.040, d = 0.702
PANAS-NA (Negative Affectivity)	High reap.	19	18.42	4.401	t(35) = 2.133, p = 0.040, d = 0.702
PANAS Total score	Low reap.	18	54.83	8.104	t(35) = 0.470, p = 0.641, d = 0.155
PANAS Total score	High reap.	19	53.68	6.725	t(35) = 0.470, p = 0.641, d = 0.155
ERQ Expressive Suppression	Low reap.	18	12.44	5.170	t(35) = -0.581, p = 0.565, d = -0.191
ERQ Expressive Suppression	High reap.	19	13.37	4.500	t(35) = -0.581, p = 0.565, d = -0.191
IRI Perspective Taking	Low reap.	18	22.61	4.075	t(35) = -1.739, p = 0.091, d = -0.572
IRI Perspective Taking	High reap.	19	24.63	2.929	t(35) = -1.739, p = 0.091, d = -0.572
IRI Empathic Concern	Low reap.	18	24.11	3.771	t(35) = -0.693, p = 0.493, d = -0.228
IRI Empathic Concern	High reap.	19	24.95	3.566	t(35) = -0.693, p = 0.493, d = -0.228