Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 24;41(8):1961–1974. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2022.3154599

TABLE II. Comparison of Other Cardiac Motion Tracking Methods. Inline graphic Indicates the Higher Value the Better While Inline graphic Indicates the Lower Value the Better. Results are Reported as “Mean (Standard Deviation)” for Dice, Hausdorff Distance (HD), Volume Difference (VD) and Negative Jacobian Determinant ( Inline graphic ( Inline graphic) < 0). CPU and GPU Runtimes are Reported as the Average Inference Time for a Single Subject. Best Results in Bold.

Methods Anatomical views Dice Inline graphic HD (mm) Inline graphic VD (%) Inline graphic Inline graphic (%) Inline graphic Times CPU (s) Inline graphic Times GPU (s) Inline graphic
FFD [23] SAX 0.7250 (0.0511) 20.1138 (5.1130) 14.45 (6.87) 11.94 (5.01) 15.91 –
dDemons [29] SAX 0.7219 (0.0422) 18.3945 (3.5650) 14.46 (6.38) 0.13 (0.17) 28.32 –
3D-UNet [44] SAX 0.7382 (0.0293) 17.4785 (3.1030) 30.97 (9.89) 0.95 (1.05) 16.88 1.09
MulViMotion SAX, 2CH, 4CH 0.8200 (0.0348) 14.5937 (4.2449) 8.62 (4.85) 0.93 (0.94) 3.55 1.15