. 2022 Feb 24;41(8):1961–1974. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2022.3154599

TABLE VII. Quantitative Comparison Between VoxelMorph (VM) [42] and MulVi Motion on Test Set. VM Follows the Optimal Architecture and Hyper-Parameters Suggested by the Authors. VM† Uses a Bigger Architecture¹⁰. Results are Reported the Same Way as Table II. Best Results in Bold.

Methods	Dice	HD (mm)	VD (%)
VM [44]	0.7115 (0.0339)	15.3277 (2.7690)	34.71 (11.84)
VM† [44]	0.7147 (0.0307)	17.6747 (4.3181)	31.75 (10.80)
MulViMotion	0.8200 (0.0348)	14.5937 (4.2449)	8.62 (4.85)

TABLE VII. Quantitative Comparison Between VoxelMorph (VM) [42] and MulVi Motion on Test Set. VM Follows the Optimal Architecture and Hyper-Parameters Suggested by the Authors. VM† Uses a Bigger Architecture10. Results are Reported the Same Way as Table II. Best Results in Bold.