Table 3.
Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models of the association between binge eating at baseline and individual constituent component of the metabolic syndrome at follow up. Sample based on participants with complete data. (n=13,388)
Hypertension | Hypertriglyceridemia | High fasting blood glucose | Low HDL cholesterol | High waist circumference | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
n (%) with outcome | n (%) with outcome | n (%) with outcome | n (%) with outcome | n (%) with outcome | |
Binge eating absent | 4,902 (43.2%) | 3,091 (27.3%) | 2,175 (19.2%) | 2,776 (24.5%) | 8,438 (74.3%) |
Binge eating present | 1,001 (48.9%) | 716 (35.0%) | 500 (24.4%) | 654 (31.9%) | 1,812 (88.5%) |
Odds ratio (95%CI) | Odds ratio (95%CI) | Odds ratio (95%CI) | Odds ratio (95%CI) | Odds ratio (95%CI) | |
Adjusted model 3 | 1.14 (0.99 to 1.31), p=0.067 | 1.21 (1.07 to 1.37), p=0.003 | 1.00 (0.85 to 1.18), p=0.989 | 1.06 (0.93 to 1.21), p=0.364 | 0.92 (0.75 to 1.13), p=0.449 |
Binge eating*sex interaction p-value | 0.577 | 0.020 | 0.229 | 0.773 | 0.745 |
Females | 1.09 (0.92 to 1.29) |
List of abbreviations: CI = confidence interval
Adjusted model 1: sex, ethnicity, education, marital status, social class, total CIS-R score, smoking, and alcohol consumption
Adjusted model 2 = model 1 + outcome value at baseline
Adjusted model 3 = model 2 + BMI at baseline