Table 3.

Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models of the association between binge eating at baseline and individual constituent component of the metabolic syndrome at follow up. Sample based on participants with complete data. (n=13,388)

	Hypertension	Hypertriglyceridemia	High fasting blood glucose	Low HDL cholesterol	High waist circumference
	n (%) with outcome	n (%) with outcome	n (%) with outcome	n (%) with outcome	n (%) with outcome
Binge eating absent	4,902 (43.2%)	3,091 (27.3%)	2,175 (19.2%)	2,776 (24.5%)	8,438 (74.3%)
Binge eating present	1,001 (48.9%)	716 (35.0%)	500 (24.4%)	654 (31.9%)	1,812 (88.5%)
	Odds ratio (95%CI)	Odds ratio (95%CI)	Odds ratio (95%CI)	Odds ratio (95%CI)	Odds ratio (95%CI)
Crude model	1.26 (1.14 to 1.38), p<0.0001	1.43 (1.30 to 1.58), p<0.0001	1.36 (1.22 to 1.52), p<0.0001	1.44 (1.31 to 1.60), p<0.0001	2.65 (2.30 to 3.06), p<0.0001
Adjusted model 1	1.41 (1.27 to 1.56), p<0.0001	1.50 (1.35 to 1.67), P<0.0001	1.48 (1.32 to 1.67), p<0.0001	1.32 (1.19 to 1.47), p<0.0001	2.57 (2.23 to 2.97), p<0.0001
Adjusted model 2	1.41 (1.23 to 1.62), p<0.0001	1.33 (1.17 to 1.50), P<0.0001	1.27 (1.09 to 1.50), p=0.003	1.22 (1.08 to 1.38), p=0.002	1.39 (1.16 to 1.68), p=0.0004
Adjusted model 3	1.14 (0.99 to 1.31), p=0.067	1.21 (1.07 to 1.37), p=0.003	1.00 (0.85 to 1.18), p=0.989	1.06 (0.93 to 1.21), p=0.364	0.92 (0.75 to 1.13), p=0.449
Binge eating*sex interaction p-value	0.577	0.020	0.229	0.773	0.745
Males		1.39 (1.15 to 1.68)
Females		1.09 (0.92 to 1.29)

List of abbreviations: CI = confidence interval

Adjusted model 1: sex, ethnicity, education, marital status, social class, total CIS-R score, smoking, and alcohol consumption

Adjusted model 2 = model 1 + outcome value at baseline

Adjusted model 3 = model 2 + BMI at baseline