Table 5. Delphi participants’ ranking of the top 10 recruitment strategies in family-based experimental research.
Rank | Recruitment source | Recruitment strategy | Total1 | Top rank2 |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Community | Research team speaking to parents while they are waiting for their children (e.g., while waiting during their child’s swimming lesson) | 64 | 4 |
2 | School | Letter sent from head teacher to parents on behalf of research team | 77 | 1 |
3 | School | Research team attending parent meetings (e.g., orientation meetings) | 79 | 2 |
4 | Employer | Study information emailed to employees from within organisation on behalf of the research team (e.g., from human resources) | 86 | 3 |
5 | Primary care | Letters sent from general practitioner or health care providers on behalf of research team | 86 | 3 |
6 | School | Assembly delivered to parents by research team | 96 | 2 |
7 | Referral | Word-of mouth | 97 | 1 |
8 | Primary care | Letters sent directly to potential participants from research team | 98 | 0 |
9 | Media | Social media posts (e.g., Facebook, Twitter, Instagram) | 106 | 1 |
10 | Media | Television (e.g., local news story promoting study) | 146 | 0 |
Participants’ rankings were summed to determine an overall rank of the strategy (i.e., lower scores indicated higher ranks).
Count of number 1 rankings strategy received.