Table 2. Risk of bias assessment of the observational studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
Selection* | Comparability† | Exposure‡ | Risk of bias | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | Notes | Score | Notes | Score | Notes | ||
Chippaux et al (1993)32 | 2 | Pregnancy tests were not done and therefore no independent validation of pregnancy was available | NA | Study was not controlled for age, history of pregnancy-related serious adverse events, or any other substantial factor | 2 | Exposure to ivermectin was self-reported | High |
Doumbo et al (1992)33 | 2 | Pregnancy tests were not done and therefore no independent validation of pregnancy was available; adverse pregnancy outcomes were self-reported | NA | Study was not controlled for age, history of pregnancy-related serious adverse events, or any other substantial factor | 2 | Exposure to ivermectin was self-reported | High |
Gyapong et al (2003)34 | 2 | Pregnancy tests were not done and therefore no independent validation of pregnancy was available | NA | Study was not controlled for age, history of pregnancy-related serious adverse events, or any other substantial factor | 1 | Exposure to ivermectin was self-reported; the study reports exposure to albendazole or ivermectin during pregnancy, in which it is unclear if all cases received ivermectin | High |
Makene et al (2003)35 | 2 | Pregnancy tests were not done and therefore no independent validation of pregnancy was available; adverse pregnancy outcomes were self-reported | 1 | .. | 2 | Ascertainment of exposure was not described | Moderate |
Pacque et al (1990)13 | 2 | Pregnancy tests were not done and therefore no independent validation of pregnancy was available | 1 | .. | 3 | .. | Moderate |
NA=not available. *Maximum score of 4. †Maximum score of 2. ‡Maximum score of 3.