Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Sep 5.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Jan 1;8(1):e92–e100. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30453-X

Table 2. Risk of bias assessment of the observational studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

Selection* Comparability Exposure Risk of bias
Score Notes Score Notes Score Notes
Chippaux et al (1993)32 2 Pregnancy tests were not done and therefore no independent validation of pregnancy was available NA Study was not controlled for age, history of pregnancy-related serious adverse events, or any other substantial factor 2 Exposure to ivermectin was self-reported High
Doumbo et al (1992)33 2 Pregnancy tests were not done and therefore no independent validation of pregnancy was available; adverse pregnancy outcomes were self-reported NA Study was not controlled for age, history of pregnancy-related serious adverse events, or any other substantial factor 2 Exposure to ivermectin was self-reported High
Gyapong et al (2003)34 2 Pregnancy tests were not done and therefore no independent validation of pregnancy was available NA Study was not controlled for age, history of pregnancy-related serious adverse events, or any other substantial factor 1 Exposure to ivermectin was self-reported; the study reports exposure to albendazole or ivermectin during pregnancy, in which it is unclear if all cases received ivermectin High
Makene et al (2003)35 2 Pregnancy tests were not done and therefore no independent validation of pregnancy was available; adverse pregnancy outcomes were self-reported 1 .. 2 Ascertainment of exposure was not described Moderate
Pacque et al (1990)13 2 Pregnancy tests were not done and therefore no independent validation of pregnancy was available 1 .. 3 .. Moderate

NA=not available. *Maximum score of 4. †Maximum score of 2. ‡Maximum score of 3.