Table 1.
Overall sample | Overweight/obesity | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
(BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) | ||||
Yes | No | p-value* | ||
(n = 79,422) | (n = 49,085) | (n = 30,337) | ||
Gender, % | ||||
Women | 58.0 | 60.4 | 39.6 | < 0.01 |
Men | 42.0 | 63.8 | 36.2 | |
Age, mean (SD) | 42.8 (16.9) | 44.9 (15.9) | 39.3 (17.8) | < 0.01 |
Individual education, % | ||||
University | 13.4 | 12.4 | 15.0 | < 0.01 |
Secondary | 34.2 | 31.0 | 37.9 | |
Primary | 35.2 | 37.0 | 32.3 | |
Less than primary | 17.2 | 18.6 | 14.8 | |
Sub-city living conditions, mean (SE) | 0.72 (1.96) | 0.59 (2.00) | 0.91 (1.87) | < 0.01 |
City labor women’s empowerment, mean (SD) | 0.65 (3.03) | 0.34 (3.09) | 1.15 (2.85) | < 0.01 |
City Gini coefficient, mean (SD) | 0.49 (0.10) | 0.49 (0.10) | 0.50 (0.10) | < 0.01 |
City GDP per-capita (USD, thousands), mean (SD) | 18.2 (13.6) | 18.7 (14.6) | 17.5 (11.8) | < 0.01 |
City population size (millions), mean (SD) | 3.7 (5.6) | 3.7 (5.7) | 3.7 (5.6) | 0.93 |
SD, standard deviation; GDP, gross domestic product. Sub-city living conditions range from − 9.92 to 3.90 with higher scores corresponding to better conditions; labor women’s empowerment ranges from − 8.20 to 6.28 with higher scores corresponding to higher labor women’s empowerment; Gini coefficient ranges from 0.29 to 0.68 with higher scores corresponding to higher income inequality. *p-values test the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the proportion (χ2) or mean (t-test) of the characteristic between individuals with and without overweight/obesity