Table 4. Performance comparison to State-of-the-art Approaches.
| Method | Sen | Spc | Prc | Acc | F1 | MCC | FMI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RBFNN [16] | 66.89 | 75.47 | 73.23 | 71.18 | 69.88 | 42.56 | 69.97 |
| ±2.43 | ±2.53 | ±1.48 | ±0.80 | ±1.08 | ±1.61 | ±1.04 | |
| WE-BBO [18] | 72.97 | 74.93 | 74.48 | 73.95 | 73.66 | 47.99 | 73.66 |
| ±2.96 | ±2.39 | ±1.34 | ±0.98 | ±0.98 | ±2.00 | ±1.33 | |
| GLCM-SVM [17] | 72.03 | 78.04 | 76.66 | 75.03 | 74.24 | 50.20 | 74.29 |
| ±2.94 | ±1.72 | ±1.07 | ±1.12 | ±1.57 | ±2.17 | ±1.53 | |
| WE-JAYA [19] | 73.31 | 78.11 | 77.03 | 75.71 | 75.10 | 51.51 | 75.14 |
| ±2.26 | ±1.92 | ±1.35 | ±1.04 | ±1.23 | ±2.07 | ±1.22 | |
| GoogLeNet [15] | 77.64 | 83.85 | 82.82 | 80.74 | 80.12 | 61.65 | 80.17 |
| ±2.22 | ±2.00 | ±1.54 | ±0.91 | ±1.07 | ±1.81 | ±1.05 | |
| WE-SAJ | 85.47 | 87.23 | 87.03 | 86.35 | 86.23 | 72.75 | 86.24 |
| ±1.84 | ±1.67 | ±1.34 | ±0.70 | ±0.77 | ±1.38 | ±0.76 |
(Sen = Sensitivity; Spc = Specificity; Prc = Precision; Acc = Accuracy; F1 = F1 Score; MCC = Matthews correlation coefficient; FMI = Fowlkes-Mallows Index)