Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jul 3.
Published in final edited form as: BJOG. 2020 Aug 16;128(4):714–726. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16424

Table 4. Factors associated with retrospective acceptability of RRESDO among women who have undergone premenopausal RRSO.

OR SE P >|z| 95% CI
Prior knowledge of tubal origin of ovarian cancer 1.514 0.444 0.35 0.63-3.625
Personal history of breast cancer 0.731 0.468 0.504 0.289-1.824
Previous risk reducing mastectomy 0.618 0.456 0.291 0.249-1.5
Carrier status 1.626 0.898 0.589 0.31-12.385
Marital status 0.716 0.458 0.466 0.291-1.768
Ethnicity 1.184 0.635 0.791 0.321-4.058
Education 1.11 0.398 0.793 0.507-2.433
Income 1.079 0.194 0.695 0.739-1.589
FH
BC 1.445 0.896 0.682 0.281-11.041
OC 1.754 1.120 0.616 0.198-18.561
BC and OC 0.944 1.166 0.961 0.083-9.194
Experienced menopausal sequelae following RRSO
Hot flushes 0.09 0.955 0.013 0.013-0.566
Night sweats 13.76 1.108 0.018 1.729-140.177
Sleep disturbance 18.78 0.988 0.003 3.186-160.144
Vaginal dryness 0.76 0.658 0.671 0.204-2.774
Sexual dysfunction 5.34 0.779 0.031 1.244-27.467
Loss of fertility 0.70 0.669 0.587 0.174-2.501
Osteoporosis 0.25 0.700 0.045 0.057-0.919
Urinary incontinence 17.20 0.807 <0.001 3.985-98.597
Fatigue 0.01 1.150 <0.001 0.001-0.096
Memory loss 0.67 0.662 0.541 0.177-2.45
Mood alterations 3.06 0.684 0.102 0.834-12.654
Impact on relationship with partner 1.81 0.676 0.379 0.49-7.158
Satisfaction/regret following RRSO
I regret the choice that was made 6.385 0.866 0.032 1.251-40.746
I would make the same decision if I had to do it over again 0.471 4.597 0.87 0.001-205.952
The decision did me a lot of harm 3.877 0.590 0.022 1.226-12.795
I was directly influenced by the direct wishes of my family 3.762 0.700 0.058 0.974-15.615
I was influenced by the unexpressed wishes of my family 0.401 0.734 0.212 0.089-1.631

BC, breast cancer; FH, family history; HRT, hormone replacement therapy; OC, ovarian cancer; RRESDO, risk-reducing early salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy; RRM, risk-reducing mastectomy.

Multiple logistic regression analysis on factors affecting retrospective acceptability (‘probably, maybe’ versus ‘probably not, definitely not’ responses) of undergoing RRESDO had it been an option in 159 women who have undergone premenopausal RRSO. Model adjusted for marital status, ethnicity, education, income, family history of ovarian cancer/breast cancer, risk-reducing mastectomy and personal history of breast cancer. Prior knowledge of tubal origin of OC: ‘yes’ versus ‘no’; personal history of BC: ‘yes’ versus ‘no’; previous RRM: ‘yes’ versus ‘no’; family complete: no versus yes; carrier status: BRCA1/BRCA2 versus intermediate risk (RAD51C carrier/RAD51D carrier/BRIP1 carrier/BRCA-negative but strong FH of OC/BRCA untested but strong FH of OC); marital status: in a relationship (married, cohabiting/living with partner) versus not in a relationship (single, divorced, separated, widowed); ethnicity: non-caucasian versus caucasian; education: university level education (PhD, Masters, Bachelor’s degree) versus below university level education (NVQ4, A-level/NVQ3, NVQ1/NVQ2, GCSE/O-level/CSE, no formal qualification); timing of future OC prevention surgery: planning surgery now/within 5 years versus not planning surgery; FH BC (FH of BC alone plus FH of BC and OC): ‘yes’ versus ‘no’; FH OC (FH of OC alone plus FH of OC and BC): ‘yes’ versus ‘no’; FH BC and OC: ‘yes’ versus ‘no’; hot flushes: ‘yes’ versus ‘no’; night sweats: ‘yes’ versus ‘no’; sleep disturbance: ‘yes’ versus ‘no’; vaginal dryness: ‘yes’ versus ‘no’; sexual dysfunction: ‘yes’ versus ‘no’; loss of fertility: ‘yes’ versus ‘no’; osteoporosis (self-reported): ‘yes’ versus ‘no’; urinary incontinence: ‘yes’ versus ‘no’; fatigue: ‘yes’ versus ‘no’; memory loss: ‘yes’ versus ‘no’; mood alterations: ‘yes’ versus ‘no’; impact of relationship with partner: ‘yes’ versus ‘no’; it was the right decision: ‘yes’ versus ‘no’; I regret the choice that was made: ‘yes’ versus ‘no’; I would make the same decision if I had to do it over again: ‘yes’ versus ‘no’; the decision did me a lot of harm: ‘yes’ versus ‘no’; the decision was a wise one: ‘yes’ versus ‘no’; I was directly influenced by the direct wishes of my family: ‘yes’ versus ‘no’; I was influenced by the unexpressed wishes of my family: ‘yes’ versus ‘no’.