Table 3. Adjusted ORs for suicide attempts at wave 2.
| Model 1: PGSI score at wave 1 | Model 2: PGSI change score | Model 3: PGSI score at wave 1 and PGSI change score | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) | p value | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | p value | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | p value | |
| PGSI score at wave 1 | 1·04 (0·98–1·10) | 0·23 | NA | NA | 1·03 (0·95–1·12) | 0·42 |
| Change in PGSI score | ||||||
| No change in PGSI score | NA | NA | 1 (ref) | 0·024 | 1 (ref) | 0·037 |
| PGSI scores increased | NA | ¨ | 2·94 (1·36–6·37) | ¨ | 2·74 (1·20–6·27) | ¨ |
| PGSI scores decreased | NA | ¨ | 1·24 (0·59–2·60) | ¨ | 0·98 (0·35–2·77) | ¨ |
| Perceived loneliness at wave 1 | ||||||
| Not at All, not often, or sometimes | 1 (ref) | 0·87 | 1 (ref) | 0·86 | 1 (ref) | 0·91 |
| Very much | 1·06 (0·51–2·22) | ¨ | 1·07 (0·50–2·28) | ¨ | 1·04 (0·50–2·20) | ¨ |
| Impulsivity score at wave 1 | 1·48 (1·09–1·99) | 0·011 | 1·50 (1·15–1·96) | 0·0030 | 1·45 (1·09–1·94) | 0·011 |
| Happiness score at wave 1* | 0·85 (0·73–0·98) | 0·023 | 0·85 (0·74–0·98) | 0·022 | 0·84 (0·72–0·97) | 0·016 |
| Anxiousness score at wave 1† | 1·14 (1·01–1·28) | 0·036 | 1·13 (1·01–1·27) | 0·030 | 1·13 (1·00–1·27) | 0·047 |
| Suicide attempts at wave 1 | ||||||
| No | 1 (ref) | <0·0001 | 1 (ref) | <0·0001 | 1 (ref) | <0·0001 |
| Yes | 6·27 (2·90–13·53) | ¨ | 6·06 (2·74–13·38) | ¨ | 5·64 (2·57–12·39) | ¨ |
Model fit using Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test was F-statistic (9, 1932) 0·90 (Prob>F 0·52) for PGSI score at wave 1, 0·4O (Prob>F 0·94) for PGSI change score, and 0·67 (Prob>F 0·74) for PGSI change additionAlly adjusted for PGSI score at wave 1. OR=odds ratio. PGSI=Problem Gambling Severity Index.
Higher happiness scores indicate higher happiness.
Higher anxiousness scores indicate higher anxiousness.