Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jul 26.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Med. 2019 Jul 22;237:112426. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112426

Table 4. Association of increasing own-group ethnic density with outdoor physical activity. Values are odds ratios (95% confidence interval).

Unadjusted Confounders Adjusted1 Fully Adjusted2
School-level ethnic density *
White British 0.86 (0.77 to 0.96) 0.86 (0.77 to 0.97) 0.94 (0.82 to 1.08)
White Mixed 0.97 (0.66 to 1.43) 1.05 (0.68 to 1.62) 1.04 (0.65 to 1.67)
Bangladeshi 1.05 (0.98 to 1.12) 1.02 (0.95 to 1.10) 1.04 (0.94 to 1.14)
Black African 0.78 (0.57 to 1.08) 0.77 (0.58 to 1.04) 0.78 (0.56 to 1.09)
Neighbourhood-level ethnic density *
White British 0.84 (0.76 to 0.92) 0.85 (0.76 to 0.94) 0.87 (0.77 to 0.98)
White Mixed 1.07 (0.73 to 1.57) 1.05 (0.70 to 1.57) 1.03 (0.66 to 1.61)
Bangladeshi 1.03 (0.93 to 1.15) 1.01 (0.91 to 1.12) 0.97 (0.84 to 1.12)
Black African 0.91 (0.66 to 1.22) 0.89 (0.67 to 1.18) 0.97 (0.71 to 1.32)

Results are from logistic regression models estimated with Generalised Estimating Equations to account for the dependency across repeated measurements. Missing data were handled using multilevel multiple imputation (20 datasets).

*

Assessed as change per 10 percentage points.

1

Adjusted for time, gender, health condition, family affluence, baseline free school meal status, household composition, time lived in the neighbourhood.

2

Adjusted for time, gender, health condition, family affluence, baseline free school meal status, household composition, time lived in the neighbourhood, the two ethnic density variables and their interaction with ethnicity.