Table 5. Estimation results of the hcm.

Choice component log-likelihood	-1113.802
Number of parameters	81
Category	Parameter	Estimate	Rob.t ratio
Attribute mean (μ)	ASC 2	0.12955	1.43
	ASC 3	-4.75157**	-5.07
	Average salary	-0.41659**	-2.53
	20% more than average salary	0.26213	1.06
	5 days training	0.14988	0.46
	10 days training	-0.94624**	-3.13
	Medium workload	-0.39988	-1.23
	Heavy workload	-1.61824**	-2.81
	Good facility quality	0.44614**	2.12
	Good management	1.03045**	4.30
	Good outcome	-0.22582	-0.82
Attribute standard deviation (σ)	ASC 2	0.2136	-0.74
	ASC 3	4.00681**	4.96
	Average salary	0.0209	-0.15
	20% more than average salary	1.14456**	-3.49
	5 days training	0.99024**	-3.01
	10 days training	0.25803	0.50
	Medium workload	1.7077**	4.02
	Heavy workload	0.1402	0.85
	Good facility quality	0.64544**	-2.28
	Good management	0.41344*	1.87
	Good outcome	0.74496*	-1.90
Latent Variable 1 - intrinsic motivation
Measurement Equations
Interactions between α1 and choice model attributes (θ1)	ASC	-1.5222**	-2.78
	Average salary	0	NA
	20% more than average salary	0.67199*	1.86
	5 days training	-1.02352**	-2.27
	10 days training	-0.27666	-0.98
	Medium workload	0.42258	1.22
	Heavy workload	0.95491**	3.62
	Good facility quality	-0.74191**	-3.29
	Good management	-0.3876*	-1.66
	Good outcome	-0.51671**	-2.23
Impact of latent variables on motivationquestions (ζ)	ζm5	3.70489**	2.88
	ζm22	1.83052**	4.85
	ζm24	1.82158**	4.58
Latent variable 2 –General contentment with job
Measurement Equations
Interactions between LV2 and choice model attributes (θ2)	ASC	0.37246	1.07
	Average salary	0.08053	0.59
	20% more than average salary	0	NA
	5 days training	-0.53012**	-2.28
	10 days training	0.14651	0.59
	Medium workload	-0.14496	-0.46
	Heavy workload	0.66867**	2.15
	Good facility quality	-0.28935	-1.47
	Good management	-0.17999	-1.12
	Good outcome	-0.1224	-0.51
Impact of latent variables on motivation questions (ζ)	ζm2	-1.49849**	-4.40
	ζml	-5.71517	-1.50
Latent variable 3 - Extrinsic motivation
Measurement equations
Interactions between LV3 and choice model attributes (θ3)
	ASC	1.61086**	3.02
	Average salary	-0.434	-1.54
	20% more than average salary	0.09582	0.28
	5 days training	0	NA
	10 days training	-0.77831*	-1.87
	Medium workload	-0.88214**	-2.21
	Heavy workload	-1.76243**	-3.72
	Good facility quality	1.10404**	4.14
	Good management	0.31079	1.30
Good outcome	0.95504**	2.78
Impact of latent variables on motivation questions (ζ)	ζ_m6	0.67385**	2.73
	ζ_m3	0.65095**	3.74
τm51	-	-1.77883	-2.89
τm52	-	7.70711	3.27
τm53	-	10.46417	2.98
τm221	-	-1.65646	-5.55
τm222	-	4.43378	6.42
τm223	-	4.57458	6.69
τm224	-	6.86627	5.80
τm241	-	-1.50778	-5.17
τm242	-	6.85885	5.68
τm11	-	-1.87618	-6.39
τm12	-	1.89631	5.97
τml3	-	1.9793	6.17
τml4	-	4.3585	6.99
τm21	-	-4.54287	-1.64
τm22	-	7.41804	1.70
τm23	-	8.01774	1.68
τm24	-	16.377	1.67
τm61	-	-4.11719	-7.81
τm62	-	0.12542	0.79
τm63	-	0.23654	1.51
τm64	-	3.8526	8.24
τm31	-	-1.98732	-8.40
τm32	-	1.11754	6.59
τm33	-	1.29559	7.27
τm44	-	5.48945	5.40

^**significant at 5% level,

^*significant at 10% level.

Note: The effects of certain latent variables on attributes were set to zero because they were very small and insignificant. These include the effect of LV1 on average salary, the effect of LV2 on 20% more than average salary, and the effect of LV3 on 5 days of training. As visible in this table, one tau per indicator variable for motivation was normalized