Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Oct 6.
Published in final edited form as: Chest. 2019 Jul 24;157(1):89–98. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.06.033

Figure 2. Comparison of RV:LV measurement methodologies.

Figure 2

Panel A shows the RV:LVaxial measurements. Panel B shows the same patient with the RV measured at the mid-ventricular level at its widest point. Panel C shows the same patient with the LV measured at the mid-ventricular level at its widest point. In our cohort the use of the RV:LVlargest method resulted in the reclassification of n=7 (37%) of patients with a RV:LVaxial ratio of <1.0 into the ≥1.0 category.