Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 10;1(7):462–476. doi: 10.1038/s44220-023-00081-5

Table 2.

Individual participant data meta-analyses comparing the effects of MBPs on psychological distress with control groups, by timepoint range

Control Time N SMD CIL CIU P I2 (%) PIL PIU GRADE confidence
Passive Post-int 13 −0.28 −0.36 −0.20 0.000 0.00 −0.36 −0.20 Moderate
Passive 1–6m 13 −0.32 −0.41 −0.24 0.000 0.00 −0.41 −0.24 High
Passive 6+m 13/3a −0.29 −0.40 −0.18 0.000 NA −0.41 −0.16 Low
Active Post-int 4 −0.05 −0.35 0.26 0.673 36.19 −0.68 0.59 Very low
Active 1–6m 4 0.03 −0.20 0.25 0.735 0.00 −0.28 0.33 Very low

Random-effects meta-analyses using the restricted maximum-likelihood method (two-sided tests with no adjustment for multiple comparisons). The primary outcome is in bold.

1–6m, follow-up within 1–6 months post-intervention; 6+m, follow-up over 6 months post-intervention; CIL, 95% confidence interval lower; CIU, 95% confidence interval upper; NA, not applicable; PIL, prediction interval lower; PIU, prediction interval upper.

aMultivariate meta-analysis: number of studies that contributed to the result/number of studies that measured the outcome.