Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Oct 27.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2020 Dec 7;227:117617. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117617

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Comparison of the T2i estimation per bundle in the numerical phantom which varies T2,B2 and keeps a constant T2,B2 =78 ms as described in Section 2.6, against ground-truth for the direction-averaged, AMICO-T2, and COMMIT-T2 methods. The comparison for the direction-averaged and AMICO-T2 methods is performed in a single population voxels (spv) and all voxels (av), which includes a single and multiple populations. The comparison was done on the noiseless data and on noisy data with the same amount of noise estimated after denoising the in-vivo data.