Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Autism Dev Disord. 2007 Oct 30;38(3):574–580. doi: 10.1007/s10803-007-0421-1

Figure 5.

Figure 5

eyegaze data from the autism and control groups, showing the percentage of fixations made to the eye and mouth regions in the Smiles condition. There was a significant interaction between participant group and facial region (p = 0.016). An analysis of simple effects showed the autism group made fewer fixations than controls to the eye region (p = 0.048). There was a trend towards a difference for the mouth region (p = 0.055, 1-tailed).