Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Dec 20.
Published in final edited form as: BJOG. 2021 Oct 17;129(1):110–118. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16943

Table 3. Model 1 to Model 3: multivariable models for the association between hysterectomy and invasive epithelial ovarian/tubal cancer risk overall, by Type I and by Type II (n = 199 556; Observations = 203 368).

Adjusted model Model 1 Invasive ovarian/tubal cancer overall (n = 1153) Model 2 Type I Invasive ovarian/tubal cancer (n = 171) Model 3 Type II Invasive ovarian/tubal cancer (n = 876)
HR 95% CI P value HR 95% CI value HR 95% CI P value
Hysterectomy 0.96 0.83−1.11 0.58 1.08 0.74−1.57 0.691 0.96 0.81−1.13 0.606
Tubal ligation 0.81 0.69−0.95 0.008 0.67 0.44−1.03 0.07 0.81 0.68−0.97 0.021
HRT use 1.27 1.09−1.47 0.001 1.33 0.92−1.92 0.128 1.26 1.07−1.49 0.006
OCP use 0.74 0.66−0.84 <0.0001 0.74 0.54−1.03 0.072 0.74 0.64−0.85 <0.0001
Pregnancy >6 months 0.93 0.78−1.10 0.389 0.58 0.40−0.86 0.007 0.99 0.81−1.22 0.953
Ovarian cancer 1.54 1.22−1.94 <0.0001 1.03 0.51−2.10 0.928 1.68 1.30−2.17 <0.0001
    family history
Breast cancer 1.14 0.99−1.30 0.07 0.91 0.63−1.32 0.611 1.14 0.98−1.33 0.088
    family history
BMI 1 0.98−1.01 0.548 1.04 1.01−1.06 0.009 0.99 0.97−1.00 0.053

BMI, Body Mass Index; HR, Hazard Ratio; HRT, Hormone Replacement Therapy; IQR, Interquartile Range; OCP, Oral Contraceptive Pill.