Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Feb 26.
Published in final edited form as: Genes Brain Behav. 2020 Dec 29;20(1):e12723. doi: 10.1111/gbb.12723

Figure 3. Updating of learned associations in reversal learning in mice with loss-of-function mutations in Syngap1, Nlgn3, Dlgap1, Dlgap2, Shank2 and their corresponding wild-type (WT) littermates.

Figure 3

(A) Response accuracy (% of correct responses) and (B) perseveration index across reversal learning sessions. Data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean per compound session as outlined in Materials and Methods. Significant main effect of genotype is denoted as follows: #p < 0.05; ###p < 0.001. Significant genotype × compound session interaction effects (indicated as §§p < 0.01; §§§p < 0.001) were followed by post hoc Holm-Šidák multiple comparisons tests to reveal differences between mutant mice and WT littermates at individual sessions with significant effects being indicated as follows: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. All original p values associated with the effects of genotype, session and genotype × compound session interaction were adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Holm–Šídák correction. +/ heterozygous, −/Y hemizygous, −/− homozygous, +/+ WT