Table 2.
Recommendations for ICI optimisation trials.
| Recommendation | |
|---|---|
| All | Patient perspectives should be sought to help plan trial design/communication to improve recruitment strategies. |
| Consider implementation of a qualitative sub study to investigate reasons why participants accepted or declined trial participation to refine trial recruitment strategies in a timely manner. | |
| Trial design (all) | During trial development consider whether a personalised approach could be implemented (e.g. through therapeutic drug monitoring). |
| Eligibility criteria should allow for inclusion of participants who have experienced toxicity, as these participants are often more motivated to participate. | |
| Consider whether it is possible for participants to revert to SOC if their cancer progresses. | |
|
Trial design of extended interval & early cessation trials |
Ensure non-treatment monitoring visits are built into the trial protocol (remote monitoring is acceptable). |
|
Trial design of early cessation trials |
Consider offering additional psychological support if the participant stops treatment. |
| Communication | Include an appropriately pitched summary of the scientific rationale for ICI optimisation (including an explanation that research has demonstrated that there is not the same dose-effect relationship we see with other treatments). |
| Clearly communicate both verbally and in the patient information sheet that participants on the experimental ‘optimised’ treatment schedules can revert to SOC if their cancer progresses. | |
| Highlight the trial visit schedule is not reduced despite fewer treatment visits and ensure patients have adequate opportunities to discuss any concerns with their clinical team. | |
| Provide general information on the role and nature of clinical trials to address the misconception of trials as a last resort. |