Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Sep 20.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2024 Jan 1;445:257–313. doi: 10.1007/82_2021_248

Table 4. Conduct of Shigella-CHIMs in different population settings.

CHIM setting Pros Cons
Traditional - in Shigella naïve subjects
  • Well controlled clean system, potentially increasing reproducibility

  • Immunologically unprimed

  • Has potential to be predictive of target populations

  • Minimal co-morbidities which would be present in endemic setting

  • Differences in genetic background compared to target population

Next-generation - in Shigella exposed subjects
  • Closer representation of target population environmental variables

  • Accounts for population genetics

  • Accounts for the impact of prior exposure/immunologic priming/ baseline immunity

  • May help to better define protection/efficacy and true CoP

  • Cost-benefit

  • Acceleration of interventions

  • Capacity building

  • Availability of representative circulating strains as inoculum

  • Sensitivity of the model to overcome pre-existing and variable immunity, potentially decreasing reproducibility

  • Low AR, impacting ability to draw meaningful conclusions

  • Differentiating vaccine efficacy from background immunity

  • Infrastructure, clinical/ containment