Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Nov 11.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Cell. 2023 Oct 10;83(22):4017–4031.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.09.029

Table 1. Xenla CMG cryo-EM data collection and processing.

Xenla sCMG consensus
(EMDB: EMD-18195)
Xenla dCMGDo consensus (EMDB: EMD-18191)
Xenla dCMGDo without ATPase
(PDB: 8Q6O)
Xenla dCMGDo MCM ATPase
(EMDB: EMD-18192)
Xenla dCMGDo MCM ATPase
(PDB: 8Q6P)
Data collection and processing
Nominal magnification 130,000 130,000 130,000
Voltage (keV) 300 300 300
Electron exposure (e2) 33 33 33
Defocus range (μm) –1.3 to –3.4 –1.3 to –3.4 –1.3 to –3.4
Pixel size (Å) 0.95 0.95 0.95
Symmetry imposed C1 C2 C1
Initial particle number 4,140,303 4,140,303 4,140,303
Final particle numbers 137,591 100,667 144,989
Global map resolution at 0.143 FSC threshold (Å) 3.03 3.14 3.53
Map resolution range at 0.5 FSC (Å)a 2.5–9.5 2.7–8.3 2.5–8.5
Map sharpening B-factors (Å2) –91 –93 –113
Model refinementb
Model-map CC (CCmask/CCbox/CCpeaks/CCvolume) - 0.81/0.66/0.56/0.81 0.78/0.55/0.35/0.77
Model-map FSC, 0.143 threshold (A) (masked/unmasked) 3.1/3.1 3.5/3.7
Model-map FSC, 0.5 threshold (Å)
(masked/unmasked)
3.4/3.6 3.9/6.4
Model composition
Non-hydrogen atoms 51,983 16,795
Protein residues 6,454 2,104
Ligands 10 × Zn2+ 5 × ATP
RMS deviations
Bond lengths (Å) 0.002 0.002
Bond angles (°) 0.492 0.484
Mean B-factors (Å2)
Protein 122.07 108.87
Ligands 260.17 83.98
Validationc
MolProbity score 1.35 1.35
Clashscore 4.9 5.07
Poor rotamers (%) 0.05 0.05
CaBLAM outliers (%) 1.20 1.48
Ramachandran plotc
Favored (%) 97.6 97.6
Allowed (%) 2.4 2.4
Outliers (%) 0.0 0.0
a

Estimated with cryoSPARC.64

b

Calculated with comprehensive validation (cryo-EM) tool in PHENIX.69

c

MolProbity77 validation in PHENIX.