Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Nov 18.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet Oncol. 2023 Sep 1;24(9):1018–1028. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00335-2

Table 1. Summary of stage and treatment of women with high-grade serous tubo-ovarian cancer diagnosed between randomisation and Dec 31, 2014.

No screening group (clinically diagnosed) Multimodal screening group Ultrasound screening group
Screen detected Clinically diagnosed Total p value* Screen detected Clinically diagnosed Total p value*
Randomly assigned and eligible women 101314 ·· ·· 50 625 ·· ·· ·· 50623 ··
Randomly assigned women who developed high-grade serous cancer by intention to screen 520/101314 (0-51%) ·· ·· 259/50 625 (0·51%) 1·00 ·· ·· 250/50 623 (0·49%) 0·60
Cancers by screening status 520 153 106 ·· ·· 81 169 ·· ··
    Advanced stage by screening status 446/520 (86%) 107/153 (70%) 88/106 (83%) ·· ·· 60/81 (74%) 154/169 (91%) ·· ··
    Advanced stage by intention to screen 446/520 (86%) ·· ·· 195/259 (75%) 0·0003 214/250 (86%) 0·95
    Primary surgery by screening status 219/520 (42%) 119/153 (78%) 39/106 (37%) ·· ·· 54/81 (67%) 50/169 (30%) ·· ··
    Primary surgery by intention to screen 219/520 (42%) ·· ·· 158/259(61%) <0·0001 ·· ·· 104/250 (42%) 1·00
    Zero residual after surgery by screening status 157/520 (30%) 84/153 (55%) 35/106 (33%) ·· ·· 44/81 (54%) 39/169(23%) ·· ··
    Zero residual after surgery on intention to screen 157/520 (30%) 119/259 (46%) <0·0001 83/250 (33%) 0·40
    Surgery and chemotherapy by screening status 331/520 (64%) 133/153 (87%) 59/106 (56%) ·· ·· 66/81 (81%) 93/169 (55%) ·· ··
    Surgery and chemotherapy by intention to screen 331/520 (64%) ·· ·· 192/259 (74%) 0·003 ·· ·· 159/250(64%) 0·97
    Combination chemotherapy by screening status 293/520 (56%) 93/153 (61%) 49/106 (46%) ·· ·· 49/81 (60%) 93/169 (55%) ·· ··
    Combination chemotherapy by intention to screen 293/520 (56%) ·· ·· 142/259 (55%) 0·69 ·· ·· 142/250 (57%) 0·91
Subgroup analyses
    Treatment in women with stage IA and IB 14 11 3 ·· ·· 4 1 ·· ··
        Surgery and chemotherapy by screening status 9/14 (64%) 6/11 (55%) 2/3 (66%) ·· ·· 3/4 (75%) 0 ·· ··
        Surgery and chemotherapy by intention to screen 9/14 (64%) ·· ·· 8/14 (57%) 0·71 ·· ·· 3/5 (60%) 0·88
        Combination chemotherapy by screening status 3/14 (21%) 1/11 (9%) 1/3 (33%) ·· ·· 0 0 ·· ··
        Combination chemotherapy by intention to screen 3/14 (21%) ·· ·· 2/14 (14%) 0·64 ·· ·· 0 0·28
    Treatment in women with stage IC or higher 506 142 103 ·· ·· 77 168 ·· ··
        Primary surgery by screening status 206/506 (41%) 108/142 (76%) 36/103 (35%) ·· ·· 50/77 (65%) 49/168 (29%) ·· ··
        Primary surgery by intention to screen 206/506 (41%) ·· ·· 144/245 (59%) <0·0001 ·· ·· 99/245 (40%) 0·94
        Zero residual after surgery by screening status 144/506 (28%) 73/142 (51%) 33/103 (32%) ·· ·· 40/77 (52%) 38/168 (23%) ·· ··
        Zero residual after surgery on intention to screen 144/506 (28%) ·· ·· 106/245 (43%) <0·0001 ·· ·· 78/245 (32%) 0·26
        Surgery and chemotherapy by screening status 322/506 (64%) 127/142 (89%) 57/103 (55%) ·· ·· 63/77(82%) 93/168 (55%) ·· ··
        Surgery and chemotherapy by intention to screen 322/506 (64%) ·· ·· 184/245 (74%) 0·006 ·· 156/245 (64%) 1·00
        Combination chemotherapy by screening status 290/506 (57%) 92/142 (65%) 48/103 (47%) ·· ·· 49/77 (64%) 93/168 (55%) ·· ··
        Combination chemotherapy by intention to screen 290/506 (57%) ·· ·· 140/245 (57%) 1·00 ·· ·· 142/245 (58%) 0·80

Data are n or n/N (%).

*

All comparisons are by intention to screen between the screening group (multimodal or ultrasound) and the no screening group.

FIGO 2014 cancer stages III, IV, or unable to stage.

Combination chemotherapy includes trial drugs; majority of patients received platinum and taxol.