Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Nov 18.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet Oncol. 2023 Sep 1;24(9):1018–1028. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00335-2

Table 3. Summary of stage and treatment of women with non-high-grade serous epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosed between randomisation and Dec 31, 2014.

No screening group (clinically diagnosed) Multimodal screening group Ultrasound screening group
Screen detected Clinically diagnosed Total p value* Screen detected Clinically diagnosed Total p value*
Randomly assigned and eligible women 101314 ·· ·· 50 625 ·· ·· ·· 50 623 ··
Randomly assigned women who developed non-high-grade serous cancer by intention to screen 93/101314 (<1%) 52/50 625 (<1%) 0·55 34/50 623 (<1%) 0·20
Cancers by screening status 93 27 25 ·· ·· 24 10 ·· ··
    Advanced stage by screening status 19/93 (20%) 4/27 (15%) 3/25 (12%) ·· ·· 4/24 (17%) 5/10 (50%) ·· ··
    Advanced stage by Intention to screen 19/93 (20%) ·· ·· 7/52 (13%) 0·29 ·· ·· 9/34 (26%) 0·47
    Primary surgery by screening status 88/93 (95%) 27/27 (100%) 24/25 (96%) ·· ·· 23/24 (96%) 8/10 (80%) ·· ··
    Primary surgery by intention to screen 88/93 (95%) ·· ·· 51/52 (98%) 0·37 ·· ·· 31/34 (91%) 0·41
    Zero residual after surgery by screening status 80/93 (86%) 24/27 (89%) 21/25 (84%) ·· ·· 20/24 (83%) 7/10 (70%) ·· ··
    Zero residual after surgery on intention to screen 80/93 (86%) ·· ·· 45/52 (87%) 0·87 ·· ·· 27/34 (79%) 0·34
    Surgery and chemotherapy by screening status 66/93 (71%) 17/27 (63%) 15/25 (60%) ·· ·· 18/24 (75%) 4/10 (40%) ·· ··
    Surgery and chemotherapy by intention to screen 66/93 (71%) ·· ·· 32/52 (62%) 0·27 ·· ·· 22/34 (65%) 0·52
    Combination chemotherapy by screening status* 34/93 (37%) 7/27 (26%) 9/25 (36%) ·· ·· 10/24 (42%) 1/10 (10%) ·· ··
    Combination chemotherapy by intention to screen* 34/93 (37%) ·· ·· 16/52 (31%) 0·48 ·· ·· 11/34 (32%) 0·66
Subgroup analyses
    Treatment in women with stage IA and IB 24 9 10 7 4 ··
        Surgery and chemotherapy by screening status 8/24 (33%) 3/9 (33%) 2/10 (20%) 2/7 (29%) 0 ··
        Surgery and chemotherapy by intention to screen 8/24 (33%) 5/19 (26%) 0·62 ·· 2/11 (18%) 0·37
        Combination chemotherapy by screening status 3/24 (13%) 2/9 (22%) 1/10 (10%) 0 0 ··
        Combination chemotherapy by intention to screen 3/24 (13%) 3/19 (16%) 0·76 0 0·22
    Treatment in women with stage IC or higher§ 69 18 15 17 6 ··
        Primary surgery by screening status 64/69 (93%) 18/18 (100%) 14/15 (93%) 16/17 (70%) 4/6 (67%) ··
        Primary surgery by intention to screen 64/69 (93%) 32/33 (97%) 0·40 20/23 (87%) 0·39
        Zero residual after surgery by screening status 56/69 (81%) 15/18 (83%) 11/15 (73%) 13/17 (57%) 3/6 (50%) ··
        Zero residual after surgery on intention to screen 56/69 (81%) 26/33 (79%) 0·78 16/23 (70%) 0·24
        Surgery and chemotherapy by screening status 58/69 (84%) 14/18 (78%) 13/15 (87%) 16/17 (70%) 4/6 (67%) ··
        Surgery and chemotherapy by intention to screen 58/69 (84%) 27/33 (82%) 0·78 20/23 (87%) 0·74
        Combination chemotherapy by screening status 31/69 (45%) 5/18 (28%) 8/15 (53%) 10/17 (59%) 1/6 (17%) ··
        Combination chemotherapy by intention to screen 31/69 (45%) 13/33 (39%) 0·60 11/23 (48%) 0·81

Data are n or n/N (%).

*

All comparisons are intention to screen between the screening group (multimodal or ultrasound) and the no screening group.

FIGO 2014 cancer stages III, IV, or unable to stage.

Combination chemotherapy includes trial drugs; majority of patients received platinum and taxol.

§

Stage IC–IV and unable to stage.