Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Dec 5.
Published in final edited form as: Br J Psychiatry. 2022 Sep 1;221(3):520–527. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2021.179

Table 4. Logistic regression model results for any treatment receipt for a common mental disorder in Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey 2007 and 2014 data (N = 14 600).

Unadjusted (model 4) Combined 2007 and 2014 sample Adjusted for age, gender and ethnicity×survey year interaction (model 5) Adjusted for age, gender, marital status, education, tenure, social class, CMD prevalence and ethnicity×survey year interaction (model 6)
Ethnicity 2007 2014 2007 2014
White British 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference)
White Other 0.74 (0.57–0.96) 0.85 (0.59–1.22) 0.57 (0.39–0.82) 0.78 (0.51–1.18) 0.58 (0.38–0.87)
Black 0.66 (0.46–0.96) 0.90 (0.53–1.54) 0.40 (0.24–0.68) 0.68 (0.38–1.23) 0.23 (0.13–0.40)
Asian 0.71 (0.55–0.91) 0.69 (0.46–1.02) 0.65 (0.47–0.90) 0.62 (0.39–1.00) 0.60 (0.42–0.85)
Mixed/Multiple/Other 0.84 (0.60–1.16) 0.76 (0.47–1.24) 0.82 (0.53–1.25) 0.65 (0.39–1.11) 0.67 (0.39–1.14)
Adjusted Wald test results for association of ethnicity with outcome F =4.1, P = 0.003 F =1.4, P = 0.22 F = 2.2, P = 0.07

All data are shown as odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) unless otherwise stated. Model 5: ethnicity×survey year interaction: F = 8.9, P < 0.0001. Model 6: ethnicity×survey year interaction: F = 10.60, P < 0.0001. CMD, common mental disorder.