Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Dec 7.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurosurg. 2019 Dec 6;134(1):171–179. doi: 10.3171/2019.9.JNS191949

Table 1.

Comparison of different AI methods for VS tumour segmentation from contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images (ceT1) alone, high resolution T2-weighted (hrT2) images alone and combined dataset (ceT1 and hrT2). ASSD: Average Symmetric Surface Distance, RVE: Relative Volume Error. Ground truth manually-calculated tumour volume: 2.66 ± 2.43 cm3

Image sequence(s) Method Dice (%) ASSD (mm) RVE (%) Volume (cm3) Runtime (s)
ceT1 Baseline 92.21 ± 5.64 0.305 ± 0.507 8.90 ± 7.94 2.70 ± 2.51 3.46 ± 0.41
Baseline + SpvA 93.05 ± 4.61 0.226 ± 0.273 8.25 ± 6.36 2.70 ± 2.46 3.48 ± 0.41
Baseline + SpvA + HDL 93.08 ± 4.85 0.218 ± 0.247 7.55 ± 8.33 2.67 ± 2.44 3.49 ± 0.40
Ensemble 93.43 ± 3.97 0.203 ± 0.196 6.96 ± 5.68 2.68 ± 2.45 17.48 ± 2.02
hrT2 Baseline 85.71 ± 7.06 0.663 ± 0.451 15.98 ± 14.65 2.85 ± 2.55 3.42 ± 0.37
Baseline + SpvA 86.72 ± 4.98 0.525 ± 0.292 13.38 ± 9.33 2.85 ± 2.60 3.45 ± 0.41
Baseline + SpvA + HDL 87.30 ± 4.89 0.433 ± 0.315 12.11 ± 8.92 2.67 ± 2.47 3.45 ± 0.42
Ensemble 88.25 ± 3.90 0.416 ± 0.209 9.77 ± 7.56 2.67 ± 2.48 17.20 ± 2.08
Combined dataset (ceT1 + hrT2) Baseline 92.47 ± 5.39 0.492 ± 0.427 8.81 ± 7.02 2.80 ± 2.56 3.83 ± 0.45
Baseline + SpvA 92.91 ± 3.78 0.263 ± 0.385 8.37 ± 6.79 2.73 ± 2.49 3.87 ± 0.43
Baseline + SpvA + HDL 93.19 ± 3.59 0.212 ± 0.219 7.57 ± 5.96 2.80 ± 2.53 3.87 ± 0.42
Ensemble 93.68 ± 2.80 0.199 ± 0.181 7.03 ± 5.04 2.74 ± 2.50 19.26 ± 2.15