Table 3. Results from AD-SOLES study tagging validation.

Type	Method	Specificity	Sensitivity (versus all methods)	Precision	TP	FP	TN	FN
Model	full text > 0	0.005	1	0.404	143	208	1	0
	full text > 1	0.45	0.909	0.526	130	115	94	13
	full text > 2	0.746	0.692	0.652	99	53	156	44
	tiabkw	0.933	0.727	0.883	104	14	195	39
	model sentence	0.861	0.762	0.793	109	29	180	34
Sex	full text > 0	0.053	1	0.865	115	18	1	0
	full text > 1	0.579	0.678	0.907	78	8	11	37
	full text > 2	0.789	0.417	0.923	48	4	15	67
	tiabkw	0.895	0.522	0.968	60	2	17	55
	model sentence	0.632	0.991	0.942	114	7	12	1
Species	full text > 0	N/A	1	0.521	99	91	0	0
	full text > 1	0.143	1	0.559	99	78	13	0
	full text > 2	0.407	0.626	0.534	62	54	37	37
	tiabkw	0.967	0.98	0.97	97	3	88	2
	model sentence	0.802	0.98	0.843	97	18	73	2
Outcome	full text > 0	N/A	1	0.671	161	79	0	0
	full text > 1	0.646	0.932	0.843	150	28	51	11
	full text > 2	0.848	0.497	0.87	80	12	67	81
	tiabkw	0.987	0.422	0.986	68	1	78	93
Intervention	tiabkw	N/A	N/A	0.417	85	117	N/A	N/A

TP: true positive, FP: false positive, TN: true negative, FN: false negative. N/A cells indicate that the measure cannot be calculated. Rows highlighted in blue indicate optimal approaches.