Table 4.

3D MPRAGE acquisition parameters for each relevant site in the ABIDE dataset (Kucharsky Hiess et al., 2015). The scanner used at all sites was a Siemens Magnetom.

Site	Controls (m/f)	ASD (m/f)	Image ac- quisition	Voxel size (mm3)	Flip angle (deg)	TR (ms)	TE (ms)	TI (ms)	BW (Hz/ Px)
CALTECHa	15/4	15/4	3D MPRAGE	1×1×1	10	1590	2.73	800	200
CMUb	10/3	11/3	3D MPRAGE	1×1×1	8	1870	2.48	1100	170
NYUc	79/26	68/11	3D MPRAGE	1.3×1×1.3	7	2530	3.25	1100	200
OLINd	13/3	18/2	3D MPRAGE	1×1×1	8	2500	2.74	900	190
OHSUe	15/0	15/0	3D MPRAGE	1×1×1	10	2300	3.58	900	180
${\text{UCLA}}_{\text{1}}^f$	29/4	42/7	3D MPRAGE	1×1×1.2	9	2300	2.84	853	240
${\text{UCLA}}_{\text{1}}^g$	12/2	13/0	3D MPRAGE	1×1×1.2	9	2300	2.84	853	240
PITTh	23/4	26/4	3D MPRAGE	1.1×1.1×1.1	7	2100	3.93	1000	130
USMi	43/0	58/0	3D MPRAGE	1×1×1.2	9	2300	2.91	900	240
YALE j	20/8	20/8	3D MPRAGE	1×1×1	9	1230	1.73	624	320

^aCalifornia Institute of Technology

^bCarnegie Mellon University

^cNYU Langone Medical Center, New York

^dOlin, Institute of Living, Hartford Hospital

^eOregon Health and Science University

^f,gUniversity of California, Los Angeles

^hUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine

ⁱUniversity of Utah School of Medicine

^jChild Study Centre, Yale University