Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Mar 15.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Biol. 2024 Aug 18;516:148–157. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2024.08.010

Apoptosis-dependent head development during metamorphosis of the cnidarian Hydractinia symbiolongicarpus

Gabriel Krasovec 1,2,*, Uri Frank 1,*
PMCID: PMC7617490  EMSID: EMS203329  PMID: 39163924

Abstract

Apoptosis is a regulated cell death that depends on caspases. It has mainly been studied as a mechanism for the removal of unwanted cells. However, apoptotic cells can induce fate or behavior changes of their neighbors and thereby participate in development. Here, we address the functions of apoptosis during metamorphosis of the cnidarian Hydractinia symbiolongicarpus. We describe the apoptotic profile during metamorphosis of the larva and identify Caspase3/7a, but no other executioner caspases, as essential for apoptosis in this context. Using pharmacological and genetic approaches, we find that apoptosis is required for normal head development. Inhibition of apoptosis resulted in defects in head morphogenesis. Neurogenesis was compromised in the body column of apoptosis-inhibited animals but there was no effect on the survival or proliferation of stem cells, suggesting that apoptosis is required for cellular commitment rather than for the maintenance of their progenitors. Differential transcriptomic analysis identifies TRAF genes as downregulated in apoptosis-inhibited larvae and functional experiments provide evidence that they are essential for head development. Finally, we find no major role for apoptosis in head regeneration in this animal, in contrast to the significance of apoptosis in Hydra head regeneration.

Keywords: Apoptosis, Caspase, Cell differentiation, Metamorphosis, Nerve cells

Introduction

Apoptosis is a regulated cell death, defined by morphological features and dependence on caspases (Hengartner, 2000; Kerr et al., 1972). Widely present in Metazoa (Abdelwahid et al., 2007; Böttger and Alexandrova, 2007; Krasovec et al., 2019, 2021b, 2024; Lockshin and Williams, 1964; Sokolova et al., 2004; Vega Thurber and Epel, 2007), apoptosis is crucial not only for eliminating unwanted cells in development and homeostasis (Jacobson et al., 1997), but also controls the fate and behavior of live cells (Fogarty and Bergmann, 2015; Krasovec et al., 2022, 2021a). For example, apoptotic cells can induce proliferation during regeneration in the cnidarian Hydra (Chera et al., 2009). In mammals, apoptotic cells attract immune cells leading to the clearance of apoptotic bodies (Lauber et al., 2003). The functions of apoptosis have been mainly studied in mammals. Therefore, investigations at a broader phylogenetic scale are required to understand the evolution of apoptosis and its ancestral functions (Horkan et al., 2023; Krasovec et al., 2023, 2022). Cnidarians, as the sister group of bilaterians, offer a unique opportunity to understand apoptotic functions in animals (Frank et al., 2001).

Here, we address the role of apoptosis during metamorphosis of the larva in the cnidarian Hydractinia symbiolongicarpus. Hydractinia is a clonal and colonial animal, presenting a bi-phasic life cycle (Frank et al., 2020). The settled colony is composed of feeding and sexual zooids called polyps, sharing a gastrovascular network called stolons that are attached to the substratum. Polyps are structured as a cylindrical column with a mouth surrounded by tentacles at the one pole (the oral pole). They are connected to the stolonal network at the opposite pole (the aboral pole). A continuous network of neurons innervates the entire colony (Chrysostomou et al., 2022b). Sexual polyps release gametes directly into the water where embryogenesis commences, producing a motile planula larva within 3 days. Upon receiving an appropriate environmental signal, the larva settles on the substratum and metamorphoses into a primary polyp, the founding member of a new colony (Frank et al., 2020; Leitz, 1998; Müller and Leitz, 2002). Apoptosis, controlled by a Caspase-3-like gene, has been shown to play an important role in the metamorphosis of H. echinata (Seipp et al., 2001). We have expanded the knowledge on apoptosis in the sister species, H. symbiolongicarpus. Pharmacological and genetic inhibition of all predicted Hydractinia executioner caspases identified only one caspase gene, Caspase3/7a, as essential for the apoptotic event in early metamorphosis. Apoptosis inhibition induced defects in tentacle morphogenesis and inhibition of neurogenesis in the head and body column. Knocking down of two TRAF genes that were differentially expressed following metamorphosis induction phenocopied the inhibition of apoptosis. These genes probably act downstream apoptosis in this context.

Results and discussion

The H. symbiolongicarpus genome encodes both initiator and executioner caspases

Members of the caspase multigenic family are central in apoptosis regulation (Hengartner, 2000). Caspases are divided into initiators, playing a role at the onset of the signaling pathway, and executioners that conduct the cell death. Initiator caspases are characterized by the presence of a long prodomain that can be a CARD (CARD-caspase) or a DED (DED-caspase) domain, while executioner caspases only have the P10 and P20 domains, shared by the whole family (Fan et al., 2005; Kumar, 2007). The H. symbiolongicarpus genome encodes 9 caspases (Kon-Nanjo et al., 2023) (see Table S1 for gene IDs in the two available genome assemblies), including 2 CARD-caspases and 2 DED-caspases, and five caspases devoid of a long prodomain; the latter having the architecture of classical executioner caspases (Figure 1). Phylogenetic analysis identified four clusters, which represent the executioner caspases 6 (0.55 posterior probability – PP), the CARD-caspases (0.56 PP), the DED-caspases (0.98 PP), and the executioner caspases 3 and 7 groups (1.00 PP) (Figure 1). The two H. symbiolongicarpus DED-caspases (Caspase8a and Caspase8b) clustered, as expected, within the DED-caspases clade. Caspase2, having a CARD domain, was grouped with the other CARD-caspases together with Hydra CARD1, both related to vertebrate caspase 2. No caspase 9 was found in H. symbiolongicarpus, consistent with our previous work showing that this initiator is deuterostome-specific (Krasovec et al., 2023). Notably, Caspase1, closely related to the inflammatory caspases of vertebrates, is devoid of a CARD domain and is orthologous to the Hydra executioner caspase-3A (Lasi et al., 2010b) (Figure 1). H. symbiolongicarpus does only encode five executioner caspases, Caspase3/7a, Caspase3/7b, Caspase3/7c, Caspase3/7d, and Caspase3/7e, which are homologous to caspases 3 and 7 of vertebrates. H. symbiolongicarpus Caspase3/7e, which has a CARD domain, is orthologous to Hydra vulgaris caspase CARD2 (Cikala et al., 1999; Lasi et al., 2010a) within the caspases 3 and 7 clade.

Figure 1. Phylogeny of caspases obtained by Bayesian inference.

Figure 1

The Hydractinia symbiolongicarpus caspase family (gene names in blue) is composed of nine caspases, including two with a CARD domain and two others with a DED domain. H. symbiolongicarpus Caspase3/7a (arrow) is orthologue to Hydractinia echinata caspase 3. H. symbiolongicarpus Caspase1 (grey*), devoid of CARD prodomain, is localized inside the initiator caspases cluster, but sister to Hydra caspase 3A. H. symbiolongicarpus Caspase3/7e (black*), which has a CARD prodomain, clusters with vertebrate executioner caspases.

Apoptosis accompanies metamorphosis in H. symbiolongicarpus

Hydractinia metamorphosis is characterized by contraction of the larva along the oral-aboral axis, followed by the attachment to a substratum, and the formation of a flattened structure from which the primary polyp develops (Müller and Leitz, 2002). The larval anterior pole (aboral pole) becomes the stolon while the tapered tail develops into the head (oral pole). Apoptosis in H. symbiolongicarpus starts during the first hour post-metamorphosis induction (hpi) similar to H. echinata (Leitz, 1998; Seipp et al., 2007, 2001), and TUNEL+ nuclei remain visible until primary polyp growth (Figure 2A). The apoptotic profile is spatially polarized with a high concentration of TUNEL+ nuclei in the epidermis of the oral pole (i.e., the larval tail) (Figure 2A), consistent with the observations made in H. echinata (Seipp et al., 2006, 2001). Only few TUNEL+ nuclei could be detected at the aboral epidermis in H. symbiolongicarpus, while in H. echinata, apoptotic cells form a ring at the aboral pole (Seipp et al., 2006). Interestingly, we never detected gastrodermal apoptosis in H. symbiolongicarpus, in contrast to what was reported in H. echinata. This observation persisted even after 4 hours of permeabilization, and increasing the incubation time in the TUNEL mixture to 90 min.

Figure 2. Apoptosis is required for head morphogenesis during Hydractinia metamorphosis.

Figure 2

A, Apoptosis starts about 1 hour post-induction (hpi) and is restricted to the epidermis. Apoptosis is polarized with most TUNEL+nuclei detected in the oral pole. B, The number of TUNEL+nuclei usually detected at 5 hpi under physiological condition is significantly reduced by the Z-VAD-FMK treatment and the Caspase3/7a shRNA injection (B1). Real-time PCR confirmed the efficiency of Caspase3/7a shRNA which reduced the amount of Caspase3/7a mRNA (B2). Positive control was treated with DNase 1. Negative controls were incubated in TUNEL reaction mix devoid of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (tdt enzyme). C1, Control primary polyps (DMSO, shRNA eGFP injected) developed normally. Pan-caspases inhibitor Z-VAD-FMK and Caspase3/7a knockdown affected head phenotype, resulting in polyps with stunted heads, devoid of tentacles. Injection of a Caspase3/7a resistant mRNA together with the shRNA rescued the phenotype. C2, Effect of apoptosis disruption on head development is statistically significant. C3, Loss of function of Caspase3/7b to Caspase3/7d and Caspase1 had no visible phenotype. Dfp: days post-fertilisation. Hpi: hours post-induction. A and B, scale bar = 100µm. C, scale bar = 200µm. * in polyps images: oral pole. * in graph: p-value<0.05.

Inhibition of apoptosis prevents proper head development during metamorphosis

It has been shown that H. echinata metamorphosis is caspase-dependent (Seipp et al., 2006). Treating the larvae with the pan-caspase inhibitor Z-VAD-FMK, or knocking-down He-caspase-3, prevents metamorphosis (Seipp et al., 2006; Wittig et al., 2011). We confirmed the effect of Z-VAD-FMK in H. symbiolongicarpus and focused, in addition, on all predicted executioner caspases encoded in the Hydractinia genome, as these are the ones responsible for the final apoptosis execution (Figure 2B-C) (Cohen, 1997; Hengartner, 2000; Kumar, 2007). H. symbiolongicarpus Caspase3/7a is orthologous to the executioner caspase He-caspase-3, identified to be crucial for metamorphosis of H. echinata (Figure 1) (Wittig et al., 2011). shRNA-mediated knockdown of Caspase3/7a showed that it is indispensable for the apoptotic event at the onset of metamorphosis, and for proper head development (Figure 2C). We then tried do disrupt other caspases with a domain architecture of executioner caspases. Loss of function of Caspase3/7b to Caspase3/7d,and Caspase1did not inhibit apoptosis, nor did it affect metamorphosis (Figure 2C). The specificity of the Caspase3/7a shRNA was confirmed by rescue experiments using co-injection of the shRNA and Caspase3/7a mRNA that was rendered resistant to the shRNA by three silent mutations (Figure 2C, Figure S1).

Apoptosis inhibition interferes with neurogenesis

The Hydractinia head is composed of various cell types, including but not limited to epithelia and neural cells; the latter comprise neurons and stinging cells (nematocytes). Differentiating nematocytes (i.e., nematoblasts) are located in the body column and can be detected by Ncol1 or Ncol3 immunostaining (Chrysostomou et al., 2022b; Kanska and Frank, 2013), while lectin labelling allows detection of fully differentiated nematocytes that are mainly, but not exclusively, located in the tentacles (Bradshaw et al., 2015). Neurons, which can be visualized by RFamide immunostaining (Chrysostomou et al., 2022b; Kanska and Frank, 2013), form a network in the body column with a higher density in the head region.

In apoptosis disrupted animals, we discovered a severe reduction in the numbers of Ncol1+ nematoblasts in the body column, and of lectin+ nematocytes in the body column and head of affected polyps post metamorphosis (Figure 3). Due to the abundance of lectin+ nematocytes in tentacles, we also compared their number in the body column only and found a significant decrease of their numbers (Figure S2). Similarly, the hypostome nerve net was underdeveloped and the number of neurons was close to zero in Z-VAD-FMK treated and Caspase3/7a shRNA-injected animals (Figure 3). Two scenarios could explain these outcomes: first, apoptosis signaling is essential for neurogenesis and tentacles development depends on neurons and/or nematocytes. Alternatively, apoptosis signaling could be essential for tentacle development and neurogenesis being compromised in their absence. A combination of the two, i.e., apoptosis being required for both head morphogenesis and neurogenesis, is also possible. Importantly, neurons seem to not be affected during larval development, as we detected a well-formed nerve net and numerous Ncol1+ cells in the gastrodermis of larvae injected with the Caspase3/7a shRNA before metamorphosis (Figure S3). This suggest that the effect of apoptosis inhibition on neurons is specific to metamorphosis.

Figure 3. Head morphogenesis disruption leads to a primary polyp devoid of neurons.

Figure 3

A, The numbers of both differentiating (NCol1) and fully differentiated nematocytes (lectin) were reduced in the Z-VAD-FMK treated and Caspase 3/7a disrupted larvae. Similarly, RFamide+ neurons were nearly absent when apoptosis was disrupted. Injection of the Caspase 3/7a resistant mRNA together with the shRNA rescued the phenotypes. B, Differences in NCol1+ (B1) and lectin+ (B2) cells numbers between shRNA GFP and shRNA Caspase 3/7a injected primary polyps are statistically significant. Similar effects are observed with Z-VAD-FMK treatment for both NCol1+ (B3) and lectin+ (B4) cells. Scale bar = 200µm. * in polyps images: oral pole. * in graph: p<0.05.

Similar outcomes, with regards to nematogenesis, were shown previously. Inhibition of nematocyte differentiation by blocking Notch signaling, or by downregulating Nanos2 (both Notch and Nanos2 are expressed in nematoblasts), cause severe defects in tentacle morphogenesis (Gahan et al., 2017; Kanska and Frank, 2013; Quiroga-Artigas et al., 2020). Furthermore, the present study shows that inhibition of apoptosis causes severe reduction in the numbers of neurons and nematoblasts in the body column, which had normal morphology. Therefore, it is plausible that apoptosis signaling directly promotes neurogenesis/nematogenesis in Hydractinia metamorphosis. Importantly, co-injection of shRNA-resistant Caspase3/7a mRNA partially rescued the neural phenotype (Figure 3).

TRAF genes are upregulated in the presence of apoptosis and are required for neurogenesis

To identify genes controlled by apoptosis during metamorphosis, we conducted a comparative transcriptomic analysis between control larvae, developed from embryos electroporated with shRNA against eGFP, and larvae developed from embryos electroporated with shRNA targeting Caspase3/7a to inhibit apoptosis at 5, 10, and 20 hpi. We identified a set of differentially expressed genes in apoptosis-inhibited animals (Figure S4, File S1). Ncol1 expression at 20 hpi in apoptosis disrupted primary polyps was reduced, confirming our previous results (Figure S5). Next, we performed loss of functions by shRNA injection to target differentially expressed genes implicated in molecular pathways known to be involved in various morphogenetic processes in animals (Figure S6). In the cnidarian Hydra, Wnt signaling is emitted by apoptotic cells following bisection and is required for head regeneration (Chera et al., 2009). In tunicates, apoptosis-induced Wnt signaling is essential for siphon regeneration (Jeffery and Gorički, 2021). In our differential transcriptome, we detected only one Wnt (Wnt11b) that was downregulated in apoptosis-disrupted primary polyps (Figure S7). Thus, we choose to target Wnt11b (HyS0031.57), previously shown to be expressed in the polyp body column including the head (Hensel et al., 2014), and three Frizzled receptors that were also downregulated (HyS0011.93, HyS0030.175, HyS0072.42). Surprisingly, no visible phenotype was observed in any of these experiments (Figure S6). No other Wnt genes were downregulated when apoptosis was abolished. However, at 20 hpi, both Wnt1 and Wnt3 were upregulated (Figure S7). These genes are involved in the oral-aboral patterning of the body column during metamorphosis and regeneration. Their upregulation following apoptosis inhibition may represent a compensatory mechanism. Among our differential RNA sequencing we also found NFκB to be downregulated in apoptosis disrupted larvae. NFκB is known to be involved in neurogenesis and cell differentiation in mice (Denis-Donini et al., 2005; Zhang and Hu, 2012). However, we were unable to detect a function for NFκB (HyS0012.169) in Hydractinia metamorphosis (Figure S6). We identified two TRAF genes (hereafter named Traf1 and Traf2) as the only ones downregulated at all three time points when apoptosis was inhibited. Traf1 was reported to be expressed during H. echinata metamorphosis from settlement to primary polyp development (Mali and Frank, 2004), consistent with our transcriptomic analysis. We conducted loss of function experiments by shRNA injection to evaluate their function during metamorphosis. First, we confirmed Traf1 and Traf2 expression and the shRNA efficacy at 5 hpi by real-time PCR (Figure 4). Individual knockdown of each of the TRAF genes did not result in a strong effect; however, simultaneous loss of function by co-injection of the two shRNAs led to a phenotype similar to the one observed in apoptosis-inhibited larvae in terms of stunted tentacle development and lower numbers of nematoblasts, nematocytes, and neuron in the hypostome and body column (Figure 4). Therefore, Traf1 and Traf2 likely act redundantly to induce head morphogenesis and/or neurogenesis during metamorphosis. They could also act during larval development, but this has not been addressed here. TRAF genes are known activators of various pathways such as MAPK or NFκB (Shi and Sun, 2018). The MAPK pathway was reported to be required for neurogenesis in the cnidarian Nematostella (Layden et al., 2016) and regeneration of Hydra (Tursch et al., 2022).

Figure 4. TRAF genes are involved in head morphogenesis during metamorphosis.

Figure 4

A, Simultaneous Traf1 and Traf2 loss of function induced an underdeveloped head phenotype in primary polyps, and reduced number of nerve cells after metamorphosis. B, Effects of Traf genes loss of function on head development (B1), NCol1+ (B2) and lectin+ (B3) cells numbers are statistically significant. C, Traf1 and Traf2 shRNA efficiency was confirmed by real-time PCR in metamorphosing larvae. Scale bar = 200µm. * in polyps images: oral pole. * in graph: p<0.05.

i-cell numbers are independent of apoptosis

In Hydractinia, all differentiated cells derive from a population of pluripotent stem cells called i-cells (Varley et al., 2023). These cells are mainly located in the epidermis of the polyp lower body column and in stolons, and marked by Piwi1 (Bradshaw et al., 2015; DuBuc et al., 2020). Defects in head morphogenesis could either be due to lack of i-cells or result from impaired differentiation into neurons and/or epithelial cells of the tentacles. To address this question, we conducted Piwi1 immunostaining to evaluate the numbers of i-cells in treated and control animals (Figure 5). We found that the i-cell population was unaffected in polyps that metamorphosed under apoptosis inhibition, suggesting that apoptosis is not required for i-cell self-renewal but may be implicated in their differentiation.

Figure 5. Apoptosis inhibition does not affect i-cell numbers.

Figure 5

Piwi1 immunostaining of primary polyps showed a normal location and number of i-cells in the polyp epidermis in both control and apoptosis-inhibited animals. Difference in Piwi1 cell number is not statistically significant. *: oral pole. Scale bar = 200µm

Apoptosis is not required for Hydractinia head regeneration

In a related cnidarian, the freshwater polyp Hydra, apoptosis is required for i-cell proliferation during head regeneration (Chera et al., 2009). Given the importance of apoptosis for head development in metamorphosis, we aimed to investigate if a similar mechanism also acts during head regeneration in Hydractinia. Like Hydra, Hydractinia can regenerate a complete head within 3 days post amputation (Bradshaw et al., 2015). However, unlike in Hydra, we found that no significant apoptosis occurred during Hydractinia head regeneration. The number of TUNEL+ nuclei detected was insignificant (~10) at any stage of regeneration (Figure 6A). We exposed decapitated feeding polyps from the transgenic line RFamide::GFP that expresses GFP in neurons (Chrysostomou et al., 2022a) to Z-VAD-FMK and followed the regeneration process of the hypostome nerve net post decapitation. Consistent with the low number of apoptotic cells, Z-VAD-FMK-mediated inhibition of apoptosis did not affect the regeneration compared to control polyps. Treated and control regenerating polyps exhibited a normally appearing head, tentacles, and oral nervous system (Figure 6B). Therefore, we conclude that apoptosis and caspases are not involved in Hydractinia head morphogenesis during regeneration. This is surprising since involvement of apoptosis in regeneration was shown in various animals from distant phyla including ascidians, mice, and annelids (Fok et al., 2020; Jeffery and Gorički, 2021; Li et al., 2010). These data indicate that head morphogenesis in metamorphosis and regeneration involves distinct mechanisms.

Figure 6. Apoptosis is not required for Hydractinia head regeneration.

Figure 6

A, Only few TUNEL+nuclei were detected during the regeneration of the head at all time points considered. B, Follow up of decapitation and regeneration of feeding polyps from RFamide::eGFP transgenic line. Caspases are not required for head regeneration and nerve net formation of regenerating decapitated feeding polyps. The Z-VAD-FMK treatment did not affect the head regeneration as the tentacles and the mouth regenerate normally. Caspase inhibition did not prevent the nerve net establishment (arrows). Dpc, days post-decapitation. White dotted line: decapitation site. A, scale bar = 100µm. B, scale bar = 300µm. *: oral pole. White dotted line: decapitation plane.

In summary, a spatially and temporally regulated apoptotic wave plays a specific role in Hydractinia head development during metamorphosis but not during regeneration. It is executed by a single caspase (Caspase3/7a) and regulates neurogenesis and tentacle morphogenesis.

Materials and methods

Hydractinia husbandry

Adult Hydractinia symbiolongicarpus colonies were grown on glass slides in artificial seawater (ASW) at 18°C. Animals were fed four times per week with Artemia franciscana nauplii, and once a week with pureed oysters. To induce scheduled spawning, we kept the animals in a constant 14:10 light:dark cycle, where females and males spawn 1.5 hours after exposure to light. Metamorphosis was induced by cesium chloride incubation as previously described (Seipp et al., 2007).

Gene identification and phylogenetic analysis

We performed Blastn and Blastx searches against the genome of Hydractinia symbiolongicarpus using the amino-acid sequences of human and Hydra caspases as queries followed by a reciprocal Blast search. We aligned amino-acid sequences using MAFFT 7 software and deleted the background with Gblocks 0.91b. Phylogenetic analysis was performed using Bayesian inference method with MrBayes 3.1.2 under mixed model. Analysis was run for 300,000 generations with 10 randomly started simultaneous Markov chains (first chain is a cold chain and the other ones are heated). One fourth of the topologies were discarded (burn-in values), and the remaining ones were used to calculate the posterior probability for nodes’ robustness.

Pharmacological inhibition of apoptosis

Pan-caspase inhibitor Z-VAD-FMK (V116; Sigma-Aldrich) was resuspended in DMSO and used at a final concentration of 20 µM. Larvae were incubated in Z-VAD-FMK during the 3 hours before metamorphosis induction. Z-VAD-FMK was renewed at the metamorphosis induction time.

Immunofluorescence and TUNEL staining

Larvae were fixed in 4% PFA in FSW overnight at 4°C and washed three times in PBS with 0.1% Tween (PBST). For long-term storage, samples were dehydrated by 10 minutes washes with gradual ethanol concentrations series in PBST (25%, 50%, 75% and 100% ethanol) and stored at -20°C. The dehydrated samples were then gradually rehydrated from ethanol to PBST by 10 minutes washes series. Samples were then washed in PBST and incubated for 3 hours in filtered 3% BSA in PBS 0.5%Triton. Primary antibody incubation was performed overnight at 4°C in 3% BSA in PBS 0.01%Triton while being rocked. Next, samples were washed three times for 30 minutes in PBS 0.01%Triton and blocked in 3% BSA/PBS 0.5%Triton/5% goat serum for 30 minutes at RT while being rocked. The secondary antibody was added in 3% BSA/0.5%Triton /5% goat serum for 90 minutes at RT. Samples were washed in PBST several times and their nuclei labeled using Hoechst 33258 (B2883 ; Sigma-Aldrich) for 45 minutes, and mounted in TDE.

TUNEL assays were performed using the TM red In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit (12156792910 ; Roche). Samples were fixed in 4% PFA in FSW for 90 minutes, washed three times with 1X PBS 0.01%Triton, permeabilized in 1X PBS 0.5%Triton for 90 minutes, and washed three times with 3% BSA in PBS. Samples were incubated at 37°C for 45 minutes in a 50 μL mix composed of 25 μL of reaction mix (Enzyme solution plus Label solution) and 25 μL of 3% BSA in PBS. Positive controls were first incubated for 25 minutes at 37°C in DNAse I solution (#EN0521 ; Thermo Fisher Scientific) and negative controls were incubated only in Label solution.

Statistical analyses and imaging

Statistical significance was evaluated by Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney test using R 2.14.1. Effects were considered significant with a p-value <0.05 and denoted on graphs with an *. Images were taken with an Olympus Fluoview 1000 and 3000 confocal microscopes and analyzed using FIJI software.

RNA synthesis, injection, and electroporation

Short-hairpin RNAs (shRNA) were designed as previously described (Chrysostomou et al., 2022a) and primers are provided in Table S2. Synthesis was done for three days using the HiScribe™ T7 High Yield RNA Synthesis Kit (E2040S; New England Biolabs). shRNAs were treated at RT for 1 hour with DNase I and finally purified using the Monarch® RNA Cleanup Kit (T2050L; New England Biolabs) according to manufacturer’s protocol. Embryos were injected with a mix composed of Dextran tracer with a final concentration of 2000 ng/µL of shRNA for caspases and each TRAF genes.

Electroporation mix was composed of 6 µL of 1.54M D-mannitol (240184; Merck) suspended in H2O, 9 µL of FSW containing eggs, and 9 µL of shRNA solution. Final concentration of shRNA was 1500 µg/µL. Electroporation was performed in Cuvettes Plus™ Electroporation Cuvettes (7321136 ; BTX) at 25V with a single 25 msec pulse using an in-house-made electroporator. Control larvae were injected/electroporated with a shRNA target eGFP m RNA.

Resistant Caspase3/7a sequence was ordered as gBlocks Gene Fragments from Integrated DNA Technologies. mRNA (Figure S1) was synthetized using the HiScribe™ T7 ARCA mRNA Kit (with tailing) (E2060S ; New England Biolabs) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Final concentration of resistant Caspase3/7a mRNA in injection mix was 500 ng/µL.

RNA-seq libraries preparation, sequencing, and analysis

Control and treated metamorphosing larvae were sampled at 5, 10, and 20 hpi. Three biological replicates were done for each condition, making a total of 18 samples. Larvae were homogenized in TRIzol (15596026; Invitrogen) and stored at -80°C. RNA was extracted using homemade protocol (Chrysostomou et al., 2022a). The eluted RNA was quantified using NanoDrop and shipped to the Novogene Europe facility (Cambridge, UK) for further processing and sequencing. RNA integrity was assessed using the RNA Nano 6000 Assay Kit of the Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA). Libraries were sequenced on an Illumina Novaseq platform and 150 bp paired-end reads were generated. Index of the reference genome (Kon-Nanjo et al., 2023) was built using Hisat2 v2.0.5 and paired-end clean reads were aligned to the reference genome using Hisat2 v2.0.5. The mapped reads of each sample were assembled by StringTie (v1.3.3b). Differential expression analysis of two conditions (three biological replicates per condition) was performed using the DESeq2 R package. The resulting P-values were adjusted using the Benjamini and Hochberg’s Approach, and genes with an adjusted P-value <=0.05 found by DESeq2 were designated as differentially expressed.

Quantitative PCR

Larvae at 5 hpi (corresponding to our first differential RNA sequencing time point) were homogenized in TRIzol (15596026; Invitrogen) and RNA was extracted as previously described (Chrysostomou et al., 2022a). cDNAs were synthetized using the Omniscript RT Kit (205111 ; Qiagen) according to manufacturer’s protocol. Real-time PCR was performed with the TaqMan system (4444556 ; Applied Biosystems) on a StepOne Plus machine using the fast run under Quantification – Comparative Ct (ΔΔCt) experiment. Thermal cycler was running under the following profile: 95 °C for 15s for holding stage; 40 cycles of amplification with successive 95 °C for 1s and 64 °C for 30s with 10 µL of reaction mix. Real-time PCR experiments were done in triplicate using GAPDH as reference gene. Probes and primers are provided in Table S3.

Supplementary Material

Fig S1
Fig S2
Fig S3
Fig S4
Fig S5
Fig S6
Fig S7
File S1
Supplementary Materials

Acknowledgments

We thank Patricia Calcagno, Amy Duclaux, and Laura Ryan for animal culturing, and all members of the Frank lab for discussions. The authors acknowledge the technical assistance of the Centre for Microscopy & Imaging and Screening Core Facilities at University of Galway.

Funding

UF is a Wellcome Trust Investigator in Science (grant no. 210722/Z/18/Z). GK is an Irish Research Council postdoctoral fellow (project ID GOIPD/2020/149).

Footnotes

Competing Interest Statement

No competing interests declared.

Data Availability

All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in this study are present in the paper and the supplementary materials. Sequences raw data are available under BioProject PRJNA961792. Any requests can be addressed to the corresponding authors.

References

  1. Abdelwahid E, Yokokura T, Krieser RJ, Balasundaram S, Fowle WH, White K. Mitochondrial disruption in Drosophila apoptosis. Dev Cell. 2007;12:793–806. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2007.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Böttger A, Alexandrova O. Programmed cell death in Hydra. Semin Cancer Biol. 2007;17:134–146. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2006.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bradshaw B, Thompson K, Frank U. Distinct mechanisms underlie oral vs aboral regeneration in the cnidarian Hydractinia echinata. Elife. 2015;4:e05506. doi: 10.7554/eLife.05506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chera S, Ghila L, Dobretz K, Wenger Y, Bauer C, Buzgariu W, Martinou J-C, Galliot B. Apoptotic cells provide an unexpected source of Wnt3 signaling to drive hydra head regeneration. Dev Cell. 2009;17:279–289. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2009.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chrysostomou E, DuBuc Febrimarsa T, Frank U. Gene Manipulation in Hydractinia. Methods Mol Biol. 2022a;2450:419–436. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2172-1_22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chrysostomou E, Flici H, Gornik SG, Salinas-Saavedra M, Gahan JM, McMahon ET, Thompson K, Hanley S, Kincoyne M, Schnitzler CE, Gonzalez P, et al. A cellular and molecular analysis of SoxB-driven neurogenesis in a cnidarian. Elife. 2022b;11:e78793. doi: 10.7554/eLife.78793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cikala M, Wilm B, Hobmayer E, Böttger A, David CN. Identification of caspases and apoptosis in the simple metazoan Hydra. Curr Biol. 1999;9:959–962. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(99)80423-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cohen GM. Caspases: the executioners of apoptosis. Biochem J. 1997;326(Pt 1):1–16. doi: 10.1042/bj3260001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Denis-Donini S, Caprini A, Frassoni C, Grilli M. Members of the NF-kappaB family expressed in zones of active neurogenesis in the postnatal and adult mouse brain. Brain Res Dev Brain Res. 2005;154:81–89. doi: 10.1016/j.devbrainres.2004.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. DuBuc TQ, Schnitzler CE, Chrysostomou E, McMahon ET, Gahan Febrimarsa JM, Buggie T, Gornik SG, Hanley S, Barreira SN, Gonzalez P, Baxevanis AD, et al. Transcription factor AP2 controls cnidarian germ cell induction. Science. 2020;367:757–762. doi: 10.1126/science.aay6782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fan T-J, Han L-H, Cong R-S, Liang J. Caspase family proteases and apoptosis. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai) 2005;37:719–727. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7270.2005.00108.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fogarty CE, Bergmann A. The Sound of Silence: Signaling by Apoptotic Cells. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2015;114:241–265. doi: 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2015.07.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fok SK-W, Chen C-P, Tseng T-L, Chiang Y-H, Chen J-H. Caspase dependent apoptosis is required for anterior regeneration in Aeolosoma viride and its related gene expressions are regulated by the Wnt signaling pathway. Sci Rep. 2020;10:10692. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64008-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Frank U, Leitz T, Müller WA. The hydroid Hydractinia: a versatile, informative cnidarian representative. Bioessays. 2001;23:963–971. doi: 10.1002/bies.1137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Frank U, Nicotra ML, Schnitzler CE. The colonial cnidarian Hydractinia. EvoDevo. 2020;11:7. doi: 10.1186/s13227-020-00151-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gahan JM, Schnitzler CE, DuBuc TQ, Doonan LB, Kanska J, Gornik SG, Barreira S, Thompson K, Schiffer P, Baxevanis AD, Frank U. Functional studies on the role of Notch signaling in Hydractinia development. Dev Biol. 2017;428:224–231. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2017.06.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hengartner MO. The biochemistry of apoptosis. Nature. 2000;407:770–776. doi: 10.1038/35037710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hensel K, Lotan T, Sanders SM, Cartwright P, Frank U. Lineage-specific evolution of cnidarian Wnt ligands. Evol Dev. 2014;16:259–269. doi: 10.1111/ede.12089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Horkan HR, Popgeorgiev N, Vervoort M, Gazave E, Krasovec G. Evolution of apoptotic signalling pathways among metazoans: insights from lophotrochozoans. BioRxiv. 2023 doi: 10.1101/2023.12.11.571055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jacobson MD, Weil M, Raff MC. Programmed cell death in animal development. Cell. 1997;88:347–354. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81873-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jeffery WR, Gorički Š. Apoptosis is a generator of Wnt-dependent regeneration and homeostatic cell renewal in the ascidian Ciona. Biol Open. 2021;10:bio058526. doi: 10.1242/bio.058526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kanska J, Frank U. New roles for Nanos in neural cell fate determination revealed by studies in a cnidarian. J Cell Sci. 2013;126:3192–3203. doi: 10.1242/jcs.127233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kerr JF, Wyllie AH, Currie AR. Apoptosis: a basic biological phenomenon with wide-ranging implications in tissue kinetics. Br J Cancer. 1972;26:239–257. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1972.33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kon-Nanjo K, Kon T, Horkan HR, Steele Febrimarsa RE, Cartwright P, Frank U, Simakov O. Chromosome-level genome assembly of Hydractinia symbiolongicarpus. G3 (Bethesda) 2023;13:jkad107. doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkad107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Krasovec G, Horkan HR, Quéinnec É, Chambon J-P. Intrinsic apoptosis is evolutionarily divergent among metazoans. Evolution Letters. 2023:qrad057. doi: 10.1093/evlett/qrad057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Krasovec G, Horkan HR, Quéinnec É, Chambon J-P. The constructive function of apoptosis: More than a dead-end job. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;10:1033645. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.1033645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Krasovec G, Karaiskou A, Quéinnec É, Chambon J-P. Comparative transcriptomic analysis reveals gene regulation mediated by caspase activity in a chordate organism. BMC Mol Cell Biol. 2021a;22:51. doi: 10.1186/s12860-021-00388-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Krasovec G, Pottin K, Rosello M, Quéinnec É, Chambon J-P. Apoptosis and cell proliferation during metamorphosis of the planula larva of Clytia hemisphaerica (Hydrozoa, Cnidaria) Dev Dyn. 2021b doi: 10.1002/dvdy.376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Krasovec G, Renaud C, Quéinnec É, Sasakura Y, Chambon J-P. Extrinsic apoptosis participates to tail regression during the metamorphosis of the chordate Ciona. Sci Rep. 2024;14:5729. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48411-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Krasovec G, Robine K, Quéinnec E, Karaiskou A, Chambon JP. Ci-hox12 tail gradient precedes and participates in the control of the apoptotic-dependent tail regression during Ciona larva metamorphosis. Dev Biol. 2019;448:237–246. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2018.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kumar S. Caspase function in programmed cell death. Cell Death Differ. 2007;14:32–43. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4402060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lasi M, David CN, Böttger A. Apoptosis in pre-Bilaterians: Hydra as a model. Apoptosis. 2010a;15:269–278. doi: 10.1007/s10495-009-0442-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lasi M, Pauly B, Schmidt N, Cikala M, Stiening B, Käsbauer T, Zenner G, Popp T, Wagner A, Knapp RT, Huber AH, et al. The molecular cell death machinery in the simple cnidarian Hydra includes an expanded caspase family and pro- and anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins. Cell Res. 2010b;20:812–825. doi: 10.1038/cr.2010.66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Lauber K, Bohn E, Kröber SM, Xiao Y, Blumenthal SG, Lindemann RK, Marini P, Wiedig C, Zobywalski A, Baksh S, Xu Y, et al. Apoptotic cells induce migration of phagocytes via caspase-3-mediated release of a lipid attraction signal. Cell. 2003;113:717–730. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00422-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Layden MJ, Johnston H, Amiel AR, Havrilak J, Steinworth B, Chock T, Röttinger E, Martindale MQ. MAPK signaling is necessary for neurogenesis in Nematostella vectensis. BMC Biol. 2016;14:61. doi: 10.1186/s12915-016-0282-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Leitz T. Induction of metamorphosis of the marine Hydrozoan Hydractinia echinata fleming, 1828. Biofouling. 1998;12:173–187. doi: 10.1080/08927019809378353. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Li F, Huang Q, Chen J, Peng Y, Roop DR, Bedford JS, Li C-Y. Apoptotic cells activate the “phoenix rising” pathway to promote wound healing and tissue regeneration. Sci Signal. 2010;3:ra13. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2000634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Lockshin RA, Williams CM. Programmed cell death—II. Endocrine potentiation of the breakdown of the intersegmental muscles of silkmoths. Journal of Insect Physiology. 1964;10:643–649. doi: 10.1016/0022-1910(64)90034-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Mali B, Frank U. Hydroid TNF-receptor-associated factor (TRAF) and its splice variant: a role in development. Mol Immunol. 2004;41:377–384. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2004.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Müller WA, Leitz T. Metamorphosis in the Cnidaria. Can J Zool. 2002;80:1755–1771. doi: 10.1139/z02-130. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Quiroga-Artigas G, Duscher A, Lundquist K, Waletich J, Schnitzler CE. Gene knockdown via electroporation of short hairpin RNAs in embryos of the marine hydroid Hydractinia symbiolongicarpus. Sci Rep. 2020;10:12806. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69489-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Seipp S, Schmich J, Kehrwald T, Leitz T. Metamorphosis of Hydractinia echinata--natural versus artificial induction and developmental plasticity. Dev Genes Evol. 2007;217:385–394. doi: 10.1007/s00427-007-0151-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Seipp S, Schmich J, Leitz T. Apoptosis--a death-inducing mechanism tightly linked with morphogenesis in Hydractina echinata (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa) Development. 2001;128:4891–4898. doi: 10.1242/dev.128.23.4891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Seipp S, Wittig K, Stiening B, Böttger A, Leitz T. Metamorphosis of Hydractinia echinata (Cnidaria) is caspase-dependent. Int J Dev Biol. 2006;50:63–70. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.052012ss. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Shi J-H, Sun S-C. Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor-Associated Factor Regulation of Nuclear Factor κB and Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Pathways. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1849. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Sokolova IM, Evans S, Hughes FM. Cadmium-induced apoptosis in oyster hemocytes involves disturbance of cellular energy balance but no mitochondrial permeability transition. J Exp Biol. 2004;207:3369–3380. doi: 10.1242/jeb.01152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Tursch A, Bartsch N, Mercker M, Schlüter J, Lommel M, Marciniak-Czochra A, Özbek S, Holstein TW. Injury-induced MAPK activation triggers body axis formation in Hydra by default Wnt signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022;119:e2204122119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2204122119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Varley Á, Horkan HR, McMahon ET, Krasovec G, Frank U. Pluripotent, germ cell competent adult stem cells underlie cnidarian regenerative ability and clonal growth. Curr Biol. 2023:S0960-9822(23)00327–5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2023.03.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Thurber Vega R, Epel D. Apoptosis in early development of the sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. Dev Biol. 2007;303:336–346. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.11.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Wittig K, Kasper J, Seipp S, Leitz T. Evidence for an instructive role of apoptosis during the metamorphosis of Hydractinia echinata (Hydrozoa) Zoology (Jena) 2011;114:11–22. doi: 10.1016/j.zool.2010.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Zhang Y, Hu W. NFκB signaling regulates embryonic and adult neurogenesis. Front Biol (Beijing) 2012;7 doi: 10.1007/s11515-012-1233-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Fig S1
Fig S2
Fig S3
Fig S4
Fig S5
Fig S6
Fig S7
File S1
Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in this study are present in the paper and the supplementary materials. Sequences raw data are available under BioProject PRJNA961792. Any requests can be addressed to the corresponding authors.

RESOURCES