Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Aug 19.
Published in final edited form as: J Affect Disord. 2023 Oct 16;344:339–346. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.10.061

Table 2. Mediation of the association between maternal depressive symptomsa and whether young person studied at higher education by the young person's educational achievement, depressive symptoms, and locus of control (n = 9852).

Mediator OR CI p %
mediated
Educational achievement at
14
Total effectb 0.84 0.78,0.92 p <
0.001
60.4
Controlled direct effectc 0.93 0.87,1.01 p = 0.08
Natural indirect effectd 0.90 0.88,0.93 p <
0.001
Educational achievement at
16
Total effect 0.81 0.73,0.89 p <
0.001
82.7
Controlled direct effect 0.96 0.89,1.05 p = 0.39
Natural
indirect effect
0.84 0.80,0.88 p <
0.001
Young person's depressive
symptoms at 16
Total effect 0.88 0.82,0.94 p <
0.001
6.0
Controlled direct effect 0.88 0.83-0.95 p <
0.001
Natural
indirect effect
0.99 0.98-1.00 p =
0.12
Young person's locus of control at
16
Total effect 0.87 0.82-0.94 p <
0.001
34.4
Controlled direct effect 0.92 0.85-0.98 p =
0.02
Natural
indirect effect
0.95 0.94,0.97 p <
0.001
a

Exposure: number of times the mother scored 13+ on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale during the child's lifetime. Odds ratios therefore represent associations per additional occasion.

b

Total effect is the effect of the exposure on the outcome. Note that paramed calculates this from the direct and indirect effects, so the estimated total effect differs slightly between models.

c

Controlled direct effect is the effect of the exposure on the outcome while controlling for the mediator.

d

Natural indirect effect and is the effect of the exposure on the outcome that works through the mediator.