Table 2. The effect of environmental treatment, handfeeding, size and sibling competition on a chick’s begging posture.
MCMCglmm logistic regression, N = 29 nests, 54 adults, 199 chicks, 1121 feeding visits. The Bonferroni corrected cut-off for significance was 0.007, and significant terms are in bold.
| Fixed effects | Estimate | 95% CI | pMCMC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mass (g) | -0.02 | -0.25 to 0.24 | 0.93 |
| Weight rank (smallest or not smallest chick) | 0.01 | -0.60 to 0.58 | 0.98 |
| Natal nest supplemented with food | 0.07 | -0.41 to 0.56 | 078 |
| Foster nest supplemented with food | 0.05 | -0.43 to 0.53 | 0.85 |
| Handfed to satiation before filming | 0.91 | 0.61 to 1.28 | <0.001*** |
| Mean begging intensity of nestmates | 0.31 | 0.23 to 0.38 | <0.001*** |
| Random effects | |||
| Natal Nest | 0.26 | 0.08 to 0.49 | |
| Foster Nest | 0.23 | 0.07 to 0.44 | |
| Parent ID | 0.11 | 0.04 to 0.17 | |
| Chick ID | 1.23 | 0.93 to 1.58 | |