Table 2. Results of regression analyses predicting mean weekly EcoScore of meals sold, for intention-to-treat vs. as treated analyses.
| Intention to treat | As treated | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficients (95%CIs) |
p-value | Coefficients (95%CIs) |
p-value | ||
| Intervention group [ref: Control] |
2.17 (–1.63, 5.97) |
0.263 | 2.03 (–1.69, 5.74) |
0.286 | |
| Intervention period [ref: Baseline] |
0.87 (–1.48, 3.23) |
0.468 | Omitted | – | |
| Intervention group * Intervention period |
–1.01 (–3.11, 1.08) |
0.344 | Omitted | – | |
| Intervention implemented [ref: No] |
Omitted | – | - 0.90 (-2.81, 1.01) | 0.357 | |
| Week number | 0.13 (0.01, 0.25) | 0.028 | 0.17 (0.10, 0.25) | <0.001 | |
| Bank holiday week [ref: No] |
0.39 (–1.13, 1.91) |
0.614 | 0.24 (–1.23, 1.70) | 0.750 | |
| Weekly transactions | 0.01 (0.00, 0.003) | 0.036 | 0.01 (0.00, 0.03) | 0.039 | |
| Constant | 64.57 (61.06, 68.07) | <0.001 | 64.47 (60.96, 67.98) | <0.001 | |
| N | 863 observations from 28 cafeterias | 863 observations from 28 cafeterias | |||