Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Nov 29.
Published in final edited form as: Appetite. 2022 Aug 20;179:106277. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.106277

Table 2. Results of regression analyses predicting mean weekly EcoScore of meals sold, for intention-to-treat vs. as treated analyses.

Intention to treat As treated
Coefficients
(95%CIs)
p-value Coefficients
(95%CIs)
p-value
Intervention group
    [ref: Control]
2.17 (–1.63,
5.97)
0.263 2.03 (–1.69,
5.74)
0.286
Intervention period
    [ref: Baseline]
0.87 (–1.48,
3.23)
0.468 Omitted
Intervention group *
    Intervention period
–1.01 (–3.11,
1.08)
0.344 Omitted
Intervention
    implemented [ref: No]
Omitted - 0.90 (-2.81, 1.01) 0.357
Week number 0.13 (0.01, 0.25) 0.028 0.17 (0.10, 0.25) <0.001
Bank holiday week
    [ref: No]
0.39 (–1.13,
1.91)
0.614 0.24 (–1.23, 1.70) 0.750
Weekly transactions 0.01 (0.00, 0.003) 0.036 0.01 (0.00, 0.03) 0.039
Constant 64.57 (61.06, 68.07) <0.001 64.47 (60.96, 67.98) <0.001
N 863 observations from 28 cafeterias 863 observations from 28 cafeterias