. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Aug 7.

Published in final edited form as: Psychol Rev. 2024 Jul 11;132(2):330–363. doi: 10.1037/rev0000487

Table 3. Mean Observed T₀ and Model NDT for Data Sets C to E (Same Labels as Table 1) on Which Hypothesis 4 Is Tested.

Data set	Mean value and tested prediction	T ₀	EZ	DDM_Blind	LBA_Blind
C	Mean Fast \| Cautious	226\|227	369\|365	311\|290	218\|115
C	BF (Fast < Cautious)	0.31	0.13	0.15	0.09
D	Mean Fast \| Slow	99\|95	93\|113	67\|44	37\|55
D	BF (Fast < Slow)	0.073	115	0.04	6.9
E	Mean Fast \| Slow	188\|169	217\|239	177\|153	93\|121
E	BF (Fast < Slow)	0.11	>10³	0.06	>10⁶

Note. Bayes factor indicate the evidence for an effect of task demands on T₀ and NDT estimates. Green and orange shading highlights tests in favor or against a modulation of NDT by task demands. NDT = non-decision time; DDM = drift diffusion model; LBA = linear ballistic accumulator; BF = Bayes factor. Italic values indicate values (with respects to tests). See the online article for the color version of this table.

Table 3. Mean Observed T0 and Model NDT for Data Sets C to E (Same Labels as Table 1) on Which Hypothesis 4 Is Tested.

Table 3. Mean Observed T₀ and Model NDT for Data Sets C to E (Same Labels as Table 1) on Which Hypothesis 4 Is Tested.