Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 4;20:302. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01260-x

Table 1.

Characteristics of the studies with lesion response and lesion size changes after PDT

Author Year Light sources Photosensitizer Lesion types Administration Method Lesion locations Sample size CR PR lesion size of pre-PDT lesion size of post-PDT
Mean SD Mean SD
Aghahosseini F 2006 diode laser MB mixed gargle mixed 26 4 12 1.8 0.7 1 0.9
Sadaksharam J 2012 xenon lamp MB mixed gargle mixed 20 0 10
Sobaniec S 2013 semiconductor laser chlorin e6 derivative mixed topical mixed 48 14 25 6 4.5 2.7 2.62
BM/L 40 13 22 6.6 4.63 2.8 2.81
T/G 8 1 3 3 1.9 2.1 1.21
Prasanna SW 2015 metal halide lamp MB mixed gargle mixed 15 0 13 3 1.6 0.8 1
Maloth KN 2016 LED 5-ALA mixed topical mixed 10 0 8 2.22 0.79 1.41 0.74
Bakhtiari S 2017 LED MB mixed gargle mixed 15 0 2
Mostafa D 2017 diode laser MB mixed gargle mixed 19 7 9
Sulewska M 2017 LED 5-ALA erosive topical mixed 22 5 11 1.49 1.45 1.37 1.78
BM 16 4 7 1.06 0.98 1.08 1.57
T /G 6 1 4 2.63 1.93 2.13 2.24
Rakesh N 2018 diode laser 5-ALA erosive topical mixed 10 0 10
Sulewska M 2019 LED 5-ALA reticular topical mixed 124 46 63 3.99 3.73 1.48 1.98
BM 80 27 44 4.58 4.01 1.67 2.04
T /G 44 19 19 2.93 2.91 1.13 1.84

PDT Photodynamic therapy, GaAlAs Gallium-Aluminum-Arsenide, LED Light emitting diode, TB Toluidine blue, 5-ALA 5 aminolevulinic acid, MB Methylene Blue, BM/L Buccal mucosa and/or lips, T/G Tongue and/or gingival mucosa; mixed: with different required information or information were not mentioned, CR Complete response, PR Partial response, NR No response, SD Standard deviation