Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 4;20:304. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01294-1

Table 2.

Association between the type of errors and types of impression material

Impression material p-value
Alginate Addition silicone Condensation silicone
F % F % F %
Voids in finish line
Yes 59 81.9 3 4.2 10 13.9 0.000
No 25 26.9 31 33.3 37 39.8
Bubbles in finish line
Yes 70 61.4 13 11.4 31 27.2 0.000
No 14 27.5 21 41.2 16 31.4
Tear in finish line
Yes 16 55.2 5 17.2 8 27.6 0.848
No 68 50.0 29 21.3 39 28.7
Tissue over finish line
Yes 6 31.6 5 26.3 8 42.1 0.191
No 78 53.4 29 19.9 39 26.7
Pull or fold in finish line
Yes 22 40.7 9 16.7 23 42.6 0.020
No 62 55.9 25 22.5 24 21.6
Gingival retraction
Adequate 2 14.3 11 78.6 1 7.1 0.000
Inadequate 82 55.8 20 13.6 45 30.6
Supragingival finish line 0 0.0 3 75.0 1 25.0
Total impressions with errors in the finish line
Yes 84 55.3 24 15.8 44 28.9 0.000
No 0 0.0 10 76.9 3 23.1
Retention of material to tray
Adequate 78 49.7 34 21.7 45 28.7 0.308
Inadequate 6 75.0 0 0.0 2 25.0
Voids in preparation area
Yes 31 67.4 4 8.7 11 23.9 0.016
No 53 44.5 30 25.2 36 30.3
Bubbles in preparation area
Yes 35 61.4 7 12.3 15 26.3 0.084
No 49 45.4 27 25.0 32 29.6
Tray show through preparation area
Yes 20 95.2 0 0.0 1 4.8 0.000
No 64 44.4 34 23.6 46 31.9
Poor detailed impressions
Yes 5 50.0 1 10.0 4 40.0 0.633
No 79 51.0 33 21.3 43 27.7
Total impressions with errors in the preparation area
Yes 58 65.2 9 10.1 22 24.7 0.000
No 26 34.2 25 32.9 25 32.9
Blood in impression
Yes 69 80.2 11 12.8 6 7.0 0.000
No 15 19.0 23 29.1 41 51.9