Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 4;20:523. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02871-y

Table 2.

Ratings of background and outcome variables in patient participants before and after PCPC implementation

Pre-implementation participants (n = 50)a Post-implementation participants (n = 50) Two-tailed t (p) 95% CI of mean difference
Measure M (SD) M (SD)
Background variables
 EQ-5D Index .62 (.38) -.05 (.31) 9.56 (<.0005) .53–.81
 EQ-5D VAS 65.99 (25.04) 52.76 (24.47) 2.67 (.009) 3.40–23.06
 GAF Function subscale 67.06 (15.12) 55.22 (13.60) 4.08 (<.0005) 6.08–17.60
 GAF Symptom subscale 60.24 (15.78) 48.86 (15.13) 3.67 (<.0005) 5.22–17.55
 PANSS RSS 14.67 (5.56) 13.10 (4.19) 1.58 (.117) -.40–3.53
Outcome variables
 Empowerment Scale 2.95 (.29) 2.91 (.29)
 UKU ConSat Scale 7.11 (12.44) 9.06 (13.15)

aDue to missing data in the pre-intervention sample, GAF Function subscale has n = 48, GAF Symptom subscale n = 49, PANSS RSS n = 48 and Empowerment Scale n = 49