Table 2.
Literature review
Study Name and Year | Medical Vertical | Data | ML Method | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|
Fujisawa et al. (2019)[6] | Skin cancer classification | 6,009 clinical images | Deep Convolutional Neural Network | Accuracy: 76.5% Sensitivity: 96.3% Specificity: 89.5% |
Esteva et al. (2017)[3] | Classification of skin lesions | 129,450 clinical images | Convolutional Neural Network | AUC between 0.91 and 0.96 |
Masood et al. (2013)[7] | Skin cancer | Skin images | Support Vector Machine, Discriminant Analysis, Decision Trees, Logistic Regression | Varying levels of accuracy, often not benchmarked against one another or a reference data set. Need for better validation data was pointed out. Note: studies included from as early as 1993 |
Fjell et al. (2009)[8] | Identifying, new antibacterial agents | silico library of approximately 100,000 peptides | Artificial Neural Networks | Accuracy: 94% |