Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 4.
Published in final edited form as: J Fluency Disord. 2018 Sep 28;58:22–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2018.09.004

Table 4.

Concepts created for responses to the question “What do they (AWS) say for their self-disclosure statement?”.

Concept Description Examples
Educational Statements included information about stuttering disfluencies/types or strategies used by the PWS while speaking. “Sometimes my words get stuck.”
“Sometimes it just takes me a little bit longer to say what I need to say.”
Communication Advice Statements included educational information or tips for the communication partner to while the AWS is speaking. “Be patient.”
“I might need some extra time to answer. ”
Apologetic Statements included keywords and phrases that portrayed the AWS being regretful of their stuttering or apologetic to their listener. “I’m sorry.”
“Please bear with me.”
Direct Statements that were straightforward and included no education about stuttering or apologies of stuttering. “I am a person who stutters.”
“I stutter.”
“By the way, I stutter.”
Individualized SLPs did not provide specific examples of statements, instead referencing that clients individualize statements and statements used depend on the situational. “Each client formulated a statement that feels comfortable for them.”
Situational SLPs did not provide specific statements, instead referencing that statements created by client’s were dependent on the situation (e.g., where, when, audience). “Depends on the client and the situation.”