Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 23;16(10):e1009141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009141

Fig 2. Comparison of the predictive performance of the different polygenic prediction methods evaluated on the test set.

Fig 2

R2 are evaluated for continuous phenotypes height and BMI, and AUC evaluated for binary phenotypes asthma and high cholesterol. The error bar uses 2 standard errors to show the statistical significance.