Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 23;16(10):e1009141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009141

Fig 3. Comparison of the test set predictive performance of the different polygenic risk score (PRS) methods with refitting on the training and the validation set.

Fig 3

R2 are evaluated for continuous phenotypes height and BMI, and AUC evaluated for binary phenotypes asthma and high cholesterol. The error bar uses 2 standard errors to show the statistical significance.