Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 23;16(10):e1009141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009141

Table 2. Comparison of prediction results on height with the model trained following the same procedure as ours except for an additional prescreening step as done in [21].

In addition to R2, proportion of residual variance explained (denoted by htest2) and correlation between the fitted values and actual values are computed. We also compute an adjusted correlation between the residual after regressing age and sex out from the prediction and the residual after regressing age and sex out from the true response, both on the test set.

Method Rval2 Rtest2 htest2 Cortest Cortest−{age, sex}
Lasso 69.92% 69.99% 35.66% 0.8366 0.4079
Prescreened lasso 69.40% 69.56% 34.73% 0.8340 0.4025