Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 20;10:583566. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.583566

Table 1.

Correlation between LRH1 protein expression level and clinicopathological variables in 133 patients with OC.

Variables All patientsn = 133 LRH1 expression level P
Low (%) (n = 59) High (%) (n = 74)
Age (years) 0.252
≤52 67 33 (49.3) 34 (50.7)
>52 66 26 (39.4) 40 (60.6)
Histological type
Serous
92 42 (45.7) 50 (54.3) 0.653
Others 41 17 (41.5) 24 (58.5)
FIGO stage 0.001
I/II 28 20 (71.4) 8 (28.6)
III/IV 105 39 (37.1) 66 (62.9)
Histologic grade 0.310
G1/G2 50 25 (50.0) 25 (50.0)
G3 83 34 (41.0) 49 (59.0)
Residual disease (cm) 0.851
<1 98 43 (43.9) 55 (56.1)
≥1 35 16 (45.7) 19 (54.3)
Ascites (ml) 0.473
<100 38 15 (39.5) 23 (60.5)
≥100 95 44 (46.3) 51 (53.7)
Serum CA-125 level (U/ml) 0.653
≤35 41 17 (41.5) 24 (58.5)
>35 92 42 (45.7) 50 (54.3)
Lymph node metastasis 0.011
No 81 43 (53.1) 38 (46.9)
Yes 52 16 (30.8) 36 (69.2)
Peritoneum metastasis 0.001
No 43 28 (65.1) 15 (34.9)
Yes 90 31 (34.4) 59 (65.6)
Platinum resistance 0.037
No 67 33 (49.3) 30 (50.7)
Yes 66 26 (39.4) 44 (60.6)

FIGO, the Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics; G1, Well differentiated; G2, moderately differentiated; G3, poorly differentiated; OC, ovarian cancer.