Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 20;11:570587. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.570587

TABLE 4.

Regression models (lm()) of TROG-2 total score by Language groups (either Monolingual/Bilingual, or Monolingual/Home Speakers/New Speakers).

Dependent variable:
TROG-2 total raw score
(1) (2) (3)
(Intcpt)/ 73.688 72.315 72.353
2,3:Monolingual t = 149.898 t = 106.359 t = 107.308
p = 0.000 p = 0.000 p = 0.000
2: Bilingual 2.635
t = 2.741
p = 0.009
3: Home speakers 1.493
t = 1.175
p = 0.247
3: New Speakers 3.274
t = 3.080
p = 0.004
Age −0.860 −0.479 −0.607
t = –1.731 t = –0.988 t = –1.239
p = 0.091 p = 0.329 p = 0.222
Observations 48 48 48
R2 0.061 0.195 0.228
Adjusted R2 0.041 0.160 0.175
Residual Std. Error 3.406 (df = 46) 3.188 (df = 45) 3.158 (df = 44)
F Statistic 2.995* (df = 1; 46) 5.466*** (df = 2; 45) 4.324*** (df = 3; 44)

Model 1: TROG-2 ∼ Age. Model 2: TROG-2 ∼ Monoling/Biling + Age. Model 3: TROG-2 ∼ Monoling/Home Speakers/New Speakers + Age. *p ¡ 0.1; **p ¡ 0.05; ***p ¡ 0.01.