TABLE 9.
Regression modeling for possible SIMD interaction with bilingualism in language comprehension measured with TROG-2.
| Dependent variable: |
|||
| TROG-2 total raw score |
|||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | |
| (Intcpt)/2:Monoling/ | 73.688 | 72.290 | 75.027 |
| 3:HomeSpk | t = 148.789 | t = 40.845 | t = 45.069 |
| p = 0.000 | p = 0.000 | p = 0.000 | |
| 2: Bilingual | 3.024 | ||
| t = 1.570 | |||
| p = 0.124 | |||
| 3: New Speakers | 0.551 | ||
| t = 0.293 | |||
| p = 0.773 | |||
| SIMD | 0.754 | 0.173 | −0.720 |
| t = 1.507 | t = 0.071 | t = −0.634 | |
| p = 0.139 | p = 0.944 | p = 0.533 | |
| 2: Biling : SIMD | −0.552 | ||
| (interaction) | t = –0.219 | ||
| p = 0.828 | |||
| 3: New Speaker : SIMD | 1.059 | ||
| (interaction) | t = 0.721 | ||
| p = 0.479 | |||
| Observations | 48 | 48 | 25 |
| R2 | 0.047 | 0.185 | 0.076 |
| Adjusted R2 | 0.026 | 0.129 | −0.055 |
| Residual Std. Error | 3.431 (df = 46) | 3.245 (df = 44) | 3.275 (df = 21) |
| F Statistic | 2.273 (df = 1; 46) | 3.319** (df = 3; 44) | 0.580 (df = 3; 21) |
Model 1: TROG-2 ∼ SIMD. Model 2: TROG-2 ∼ Monoling/Biling × SIMD. Model 3: TROG-2 ∼ Home Speakers/New Speakers × SIMD. *p ¡ 0.1; **p ¡ 0.05; ***p ¡ 0.01.