Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Jun 19;21(11):1671–1676.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.04.028

Table 2.

Regressions of NH Quality on ADRD% among New Admissions from 2011–2014

Model 1 Coefficient (robust standard errors) Model 2 Coefficient (robust standard errors) Model 3 Coefficient (robust standard errors)
High Quality NHs −2.995***
(0.539)
−3.213***
(0.501)
−3.432***
(0.515)
CNA hourly wage -- −0.891***
(0.253)
−0.885***
(0.281)
High Quality NHs × Centered CNA hourly wage -- -- 0.0728
(0.279)
Behavioral/Mental add-on -- 1.172**
(0.504)
0.191
(0.555)
High Quality NHs × Behavioral/Mental add-on -- -- 2.151**
(0.990)
Other State/Market factors -- Y Y
Aggregated case-mix characteristics -- Y Y
Years fixed effects -- Y Y
Number of NHs 2777 2777 2777

Model 1 only included the NH quality dummy variable. Model 2 also includes other state/market factors and aggregated case-mix characteristics that were listed in Table 1. In addition, years fixed effects were included in Model 2. Model 3 added the two interaction terms based on Model 2. Full models are shown in the Appendix-Table 1.

Random effect model grouped by facility

*

P < 0.10,

**

P < 0.05,

***

P < 0.01