Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Lipidol. 2020 Jul 8;14(5):685–694.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2020.07.002

Table 3:

Longitudinal associations of LDL metrics, separate models, with VMS frequency

LDL-C
β (SE)
Total LDL-Pe
β (SE)
Intermediate
LDL-Pe
β (SE)
Large LDL-Pe
β (SE)
Small LDL-Pe
β (SE)
LDL-Sizee
β (SE)
Model 1a
 Infrequent VMS 2.77 (1.52) 0.03 (0.01) 0.07 (0.04) −0.04 (0.04) 0.04(0.05) 0.001 (0.002)
 Frequent VMS 6.30 (1.82)d 0.05 (0.02)d 0.09 (0.05)d 0.03 (0.05) 0.08 (0.06) −0.001 (0.002)
 Trend p 0.0005 0.003 0.03 0.78 0.13 0.76
Model 2b
 Infrequent VMS 2.09 (1.43) 0.02 (0.01) 0.06 (0.04) −0.05 (0.05) 0.05 (0.05) 0.00004 (0.002)
 Frequent VMS 3.58 (1.77)d 0.03 (0.02) 0.09 (0.05) −0.02 (0.06) 0.07 (0.06) −0.003 (0.002)
 Trend p 0.04 0.06 0.04 0.55 0.20 0.18
Model 3c
 Infrequent VMS 1.59 (1.42) 0.02 (0.01) 0.05 (0.04) −0.05 (0.05) 0.05 (0.05) −0.0001 (0.002)
 Frequent VMS 1.97 (1.78) 0.02 (0.02) 0.07 (0.05) −0.03 (0.06) 0.07 (0.06) −0.004 (0.002)
 Trend p 0.23 0.14 0.14 0.49 0.20 0.14
a

Model 1: Unadjusted Model

b

Model 2: Adjusted for age, site, race/ethnicity, education, menopausal status, physical activity, alcohol use and BMI

c

Model 3: Model 2 + log-E2 and menstrual cycle day of blood collection

d

p<0.05 compared to reference group

e

Log- Transformed