Table 2.
Methods | Accuracy (%) |
---|---|
DCNN+SVM, 2017 [1] | 77.8 |
Pre-trained VGG-16, 2018 [2] | 83.0 |
Ensemble of three DCNNs, 2018 [2] | 87.0 |
Kwok et al., 2018 [19] | 87.0 |
Makarchuk et al., 2018 [24] | 90.0 |
EMS-Net, 2019 [38] | 91.7 |
Our hybrid features + SVM | 92.2 |
Our hybrid features + MLP | 85.2 |
Our hybrid features + RF | 80.2 |
Our hybrid features + XGBoost | 82.7 |
Bold value indicates the best accuracy